Patient Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes Following Secondary Patellar Resurfacing
Authors:
- Hans-Peter W. van JonbergenHJHans-Peter W. van Jonbergen
- Ashvin V. BoeddhaABAshvin V. Boeddha
- Jos J. A. M van RaaijJRJos J. A. M van Raaij
- 1 September 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SLACK, Inc. in Orthopedics
- Vol. 39 (5) , e850-6
Abstract
When secondary patellar resurfacing is performed, a uniformly and widely used scoring system that is validated for anterior knee pain caused by a retropatellar degeneration will give more insight into the results of this procedure. The cause of anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not always related to the patella itself. Other causes have been identified, such as an insufficient posterior cruciate ligament in the case of a posterior cruciate–retaining TKA or an internally rotated femoral and/or tibial component. Treatment of anterior knee pain following primary TKA with secondary patellar resurfacing is a controversial procedure with uncertain outcomes. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the available peer-reviewed literature on patient satisfaction and functional outcomes of secondary resurfacing. The authors performed a systematic computerized database search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and EMBASE in October 2014. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. In total, 148 (64%) of 232 patients were satisfied with the outcomes of secondary patellar resurfacing. A statistically significant improvement in knee scores was noted in all 9 studies that reported functional outcomes, although no clinically significant improvement in knee scores was observed. Reported complications include infections and impaired wound healing, patellar instability, and patellar fracture. Because the available evidence is of generally low quality, the results of this systematic review only support a weak recommendation for secondary patellar resurfacing if patient satisfaction and clinically important improvement of functional outcomes are the desired endpoints. [ Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e850–e856.]Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determinants of anterior knee pain following total knee replacement: a systematic reviewKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012
- Secondary Patellar Resurfacing after Primary Bicondylar Knee Arthroplasty did Not Meet Patients’ ExpectationsThe Open Orthopaedics Journal, 2012
- The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012
- What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA?Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011
- Significance of a “hot patella” in total knee replacement without primary patellar resurfacingThe Knee, 2009
- Less Anterior Knee Pain with a Mobile-bearing Prosthesis Compared with a Fixed-bearing ProsthesisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Going from evidence to recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Grading the evidence: Levels of evidence and grades of recommendationInjury, 2006
- Failure to Resurface the Patella during Total Knee Arthroplasty May Result in More Knee Pain and Secondary SurgeryClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005
- Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001