Contrast Material Administration Protocols for 64-MDCT Angiography: Altering Volume and Rate and Use of a Saline Chaser to Better Match the Imaging Window—Physiologic Phantom Study
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 193 (6) , 1568-1575
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of varying volumes and rates of contrast material, use of a saline chaser, and cardiac output on aortic enhancement characteristics in MDCT angiography (MDCTA) using a physiologic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Volumes of 75, 100, and 125 mL of iopamidol, 370 mg I/mL, were administered at rates of 4, 6, and 8 mL/s. The effect of a saline chaser (50 mL of normal saline, 8 mL/s) was evaluated for each volume and rate combination. Normal, reduced (33% and 50%), and increased (25%) cardiac outputs were simulated. Peak aortic enhancement and duration of peak aortic enhancement were recorded. Analysis of variance models were run with these effects, and the estimated mean levels for the sets of factor combinations were determined. RESULTS. Lowering the volume of contrast material resulted in reduced peak enhancement (example, -56.2 HU [p < 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL) and reduced duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -9.0 seconds [p < 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL). Increasing the rate resulted in increased peak enhancement (example, 104.5 HU [p < 0.0001] with a rate of 8 vs 4 mL/s) and decreased duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -13.0 seconds [p < 0.001]). Use of a saline chaser resulted in increased peak enhancement, and this increase was inversely proportional to contrast material volume. Peak enhancement increased when reduced cardiac output was simulated. Peak enhancement decreased when increased cardiac output was simulated. CONCLUSION. Reducing contrast material volume from 125 to 75 mL, increasing the rate to 6 or 8 mL/s, and use of a saline chaser result in an aortic enhancement profile that better matches the approximately 5-second imaging window possible with 64-MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Even smaller volumes of contrast material may be adequate in patients with reduced cardiac output.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of varying injection rates of a saline chaser on aortic enhancement in CT angiography: phantom studyEuropean Radiology, 2008
- Effect of duration of contrast material injection on peak enhancement times and values of the aorta, main portal vein, and liver at dynamic MDCT with the dose of contrast medium tailored to patient weightClinical Radiology, 2008
- Frequency, Management, and Outcome of Extravasation of Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Medium in 69 657 Intravenous InjectionsRadiology, 2007
- Prediction of aortic peak enhancement in monophasic contrast injection protocols at multidetector CT: phantom and patient studiesRadiation Medicine, 2007
- Contrast-Induced NephropathyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Current concepts in contrast media-induced nephropathy.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model.Radiology, 1998
- Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and nonionic CT contrast media during rapid bolus injection.Radiology, 1998
- Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.Radiology, 1998
- Local reactions after injection of iodinated contrast material: Detection, management, and outcomeAcademic Radiology, 1997