Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 25 (1) , 10-31
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 151 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Are Statins Cost-Effective in Cardiovascular Prevention? A Systematic Review of Sponsorship Bias and Conclusions in Economic Evaluations of StatinsPLOS ONE, 2013
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statementBMC Medicine, 2013
- An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older peopleHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2012
- Industry involvement and baseline assumptions of cost-effectiveness analyses: diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou testCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2011
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting GuidelinesPLOS Medicine, 2010
- Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge?Trials, 2009
- Transferability of Economic Evaluations Across Jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force ReportValue in Health, 2009
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and ElaborationPLOS Medicine, 2007
- Lifetime cost effectiveness of simvastatin in a range of risk groups and age groups derived from a randomised trial of 20 536 peopleBMJ, 2006
- A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologiesHealth Economics, 2006