Comparing different approaches for automatic pronunciation error detection
- 1 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Speech Communication
- Vol. 51 (10) , 845-852
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- ASR-based corrective feedback on pronunciation: does it really work?2006
- Selecting segmental errors in non-native Dutch for optimal pronunciation trainingInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 2006
- PLASER2003
- Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technologyThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- Automatic scoring of pronunciation qualitySpeech Communication, 2000
- Phone-level pronunciation scoring and assessment for interactive language learningSpeech Communication, 2000
- Assessing transcription agreement: Methodological aspectsClinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 1996
- The Dutch polyphone corpus1995
- Plosive/fricative distinction: The voiceless caseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990