Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: Routines for MATLAB and R
- 7 July 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavior Research Methods
- Vol. 44 (4) , 1157-1174
Abstract
Ulrich and Vorberg (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71: 1219–1227, 2009) introduced a novel approach for estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks. This approach avoids pitfalls that are inherent when the order of the standard and the comparison is neglected in estimating the difference limen (DL), as in traditional approaches. The present article provides MATLAB and R routines that implement this novel procedure for estimating DLs. These routines also allow to account for processing failures such as lapses or finger errors and can be applied to experimental designs in which the standard and comparison differ only along the task-relevant dimension, as well as to designs in which the stimuli differ in more than one dimension. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to check the quality of our routines.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correction to “Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009)”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012
- A model for the time-order error in contrast discriminationQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2011
- Improving the Estimation of Psychometric Functions in 2AFC Discrimination TasksFrontiers in Psychology, 2011
- Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009)Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2010
- On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder taskPerception & Psychophysics, 2008
- Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naive observersJournal of Vision, 2006
- Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms rangesActa Psychologica, 2004
- Judgments about the duration of brief stimuliPerception & Psychophysics, 1974
- Duration Discrimination of Noise and Tone BurstsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972
- Studies of Psychophysical Methods for Measuring Visual Thresholds*†Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1952