Does government information transparency contribute to pollution abatement? Evidence from 264 Chinese cities
- 10 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Vol. 29 (9) , 12853-12863
Abstract
Government information transparency is taken as a prominent instrument of environmental regulation in Chinese cities, especially in the current digital age. However, polluters’ strategic emission and production behaviors across cities, confronted with changing information disclosure level, might make the policy’s effect unexpected in practice. While many existing studies have explored the impact of institutions on pollution, government information disclosure only attracted little attention from empirical studies. Using the method framework of the spatial Durbin model, this study empirically investigates the impact of government information transparency on sulfur dioxide emissions with samples of 264 Chinese cities from 2005 to 2012. We find that a city’s government information transparency negatively relates to its local emission level of sulfur dioxide. Moreover, a city’s sulfur dioxide emissions positively relate to its neighboring cities’ government information transparency levels. The further calculations of marginal effects show that the average of such a direct and local impact of government information transparency outweighs the average indirect effect a city receives from its neighboring cities, making government information transparency benefits to pollution abatement in total.Keywords
Funding Information
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M683437)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72003145, 71603148, 71673230, 71303199, No. 71603148, 71673230, 71303199)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720191006)
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corruption and the environmental Kuznets Curve: Empirical evidence for sulfurEcological Economics, 2010
- Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effectsJournal of Econometrics, 2010
- Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: Evidence from IndiaEcological Economics, 2007
- Regional economics: A new economic geography perspectiveRegional Science and Urban Economics, 2007
- Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysisEcological Economics, 2007
- Information Disclosure as Environmental Regulation: A Theoretical AnalysisEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2006
- Rationality, institutions and environmental policyEcological Economics, 2005
- Environmental Information Disclosure Programs: They Work, but Why?Social Science Quarterly, 2002
- Free trade and the environment-development systemEcological Economics, 2001
- The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalitiesInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1997