Single deepest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index as evaluation test for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (SAFE trial): a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial
Authors:
Open Access
- 3 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 47 (6) , 674-679
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest vertical pocket (SDP) technique for estimating amniotic fluid volume is superior for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome.Methods: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial including 1052 pregnant women with a term singleton pregnancy across four hospitals in Germany. Women were assigned randomly, according to a computer‐generated allocation sequence, to AFI or SDP measurement for estimation of amniotic fluid volume. Oligohydramnios was defined as AFI ≤ 5 cm or the absence of a pocket measuring at least 2 × 1 cm. The diagnosis of oligohydramnios was followed by labor induction. The primary outcome measure was postpartum admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Further outcome parameters were the rates of diagnosis of oligohydramnios and induction of labor (for oligohydramnios or without specific indication), and mode of delivery.Results: Postpartum admission to a neonatal intensive care unit was similar between groups (4.2% (n = 21) vs 5.0% (n = 25); relative risk (RR), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.48–1.50); P = 0.57). In the AFI group, there were more cases of oligohydramnios (9.8% (n = 49) vs 2.2% (n = 11); RR, 4.51 (95% CI, 2.2–8.57); P < 0.01) and more cases of labor induction for oligohydramnios (12.7% (n = 33) vs 3.6% (n = 10); RR, 3.50 (95% CI, 1.76–6.96); P < 0.01) than in the SDP group. Moreover, an abnormal cardiotocography was seen more often in the AFI group than in the SDP group (32.3% (n = 161) vs 26.2% (n = 132); RR, 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02–1.50); P = 0.03). The other outcome measures were not significantly different between the two groups.Conclusions: Use of the AFI method increased the rate of diagnosis of oligohydramnios and labor induction for oligohydramnios without improving perinatal outcome. The SDP method is therefore the favorable method to estimate amniotic fluid volume, especially in a population with many low‐risk pregnancies. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest PocketAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2007
- Amniotic fluid index vs single deepest pocket technique during modified biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Biophysical Profile With Amniotic Fluid Volume AssessmentsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket techniqueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2003
- A Review of Amniotic Fluid Dynamics and the Enigma of Isolated OligohydramniosAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2002
- Amniotic fluid volume estimation and the biophysical profile: a confusion of criteriaObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- A randomised comparison between amniotic fluid index and maximum pool depth in the monitoring of post‐term pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1997
- A Randomized study to assess the efficacy of the amniotic fluid index as a fetal admission testObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal deathAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989