Biomechanical and Psychological Predictors of Failure in the Air Force Physical Fitness Test
Open Access
Abstract
Physical fitness is a pillar of U.S. Air Force (USAF) readiness and ensures that Airmen can fulfill their assigned mission and be fit to deploy in any environment. The USAF assesses the fitness of service members on a periodic basis, and discharge can result from failed assessments. In this study, a 21-feature dataset was analyzed related to 223 active-duty Airmen who participated in a comprehensive mental and social health survey, body composition assessment, and physical performance battery. Graphical analysis revealed pass/fail trends related to body composition and obesity. Logistic regression and limited-capacity neural network algorithms were then applied to predict fitness test performance using these biomechanical and psychological variables. The logistic regression model achieved a high level of significance (p < 0.01) with an accuracy of 0.84 and AUC of 0.89 on the holdout dataset. This model yielded important inferences that Airmen with poor sleep quality, recent history of an injury, higher BMI, and low fitness satisfaction tend to be at greater risk for fitness test failure. The neural network model demonstrated the best performance with 0.93 accuracy and 0.97 AUC on the holdout dataset. This study is the first application of psychological features and neural networks to predict fitness test performance and obtained higher predictive accuracy than prior work. Accurate prediction of Airmen at risk of failing the USAF fitness test can enable early intervention and prevent workplace injury, absenteeism, inability to deploy, and attrition.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members.Psychological Assessment, 2016
- Reliability, Validity, and Injury Predictive Value of the Functional Movement Screen: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016
- Physical Training Outcome Predictions With Biomechanics, Part I: Army Physical Fitness Test ModelingMilitary Medicine, 2016
- The interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen: A systematic review with meta-analysisPhysical Therapy in Sport, 2016
- The Single Item Burnout Measure is a Psychometrically Sound Screening Tool for Occupational BurnoutHealth Scope, 2016
- Physical Activity and Quality of LifeJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 2013
- The Functional Movement Screen: A Reliability StudyJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2012
- Workplace Wellness Programs Can Generate SavingsHealth Affairs, 2010
- United States Army Physical Readiness Training: Rationale and Evaluation of the Physical Training DoctrineJournal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2009
- Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic SystemsScience, 1988