Association of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation and Comparative Outcomes Improvement at an Academic Medical Center
- 26 September 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 50 (1) , 35-44
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been hypothesized to improve surgical outcomes following colorectal surgery; however, the long‐term sustainability of improvement remains unclear. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive ERAS program was implemented for patients undergoing colorectal surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) in 2014. This study investigated inpatient elective colorectal surgery outcomes at JHH during three two‐year postimplementation periods (2014–19) relative to a two‐year baseline (2012–2013) via pre–post analyses and using difference‐in‐differences (DID) regression comparing JHH with a national sample of > 700 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Length of stay (LOS) was evaluated using multivariable zero‐truncated negative binomial regression, whereas Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) and readmission rates were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Analyses controlled for ASA score, procedure type, age, sex, race, and surgical approach. Results: The study included 1851 patients at JHH and 303,175 patients from the national sample. In pre–post analyses comparing JHH from baseline (2012–2013) to the final period (2018–2019), statistically significant improvements were seen for SSIs with a 4.4% reduction (OR 0.54 and 95% CI 0.35–0.86) and for readmissions with a 5.6% reduction (OR 0.57 and 95% CI 0.39–0.85), while LOS was statistically unchanged (0.41 days reduction; IRR 0.93 and 95% CI 0.85–1.01). DID analyses showed statistical equivalence for SSIs (OR 0.80 and 95% CI 0.51–1.26), greater improvement for readmission rates at JHH (OR 0.62 and 95% CI 0.42–0.92), and lower improvement for LOS at JHH (IRR 1.17 and 95% CI 1.07–1.27). Conclusions: ERAS implementation at JHH was associated with sustained improvement that was comparable (SSIs) or superior (readmissions) to national improvement trends over a period of 6 years (postimplementation), suggesting ERAS adoption in colorectal surgery is warranted for long‐term outcomes improvement. Results were suggestive of a tradeoff between readmission rates and LOS.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of the first wave of COVID-19 on the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols based on perceptions of healthcare professionalsRevista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition), 2022
- Transversus abdominis plane block using a short-acting local anesthetic reduces pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a meta-analysisSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2020
- Association of Extending Hospital Length of Stay With Reduced Pediatric Hospital ReadmissionsJAMA Pediatrics, 2019
- Is enhanced recovery enough for reducing 30-d readmissions after surgery?Journal of Surgical Research, 2017
- Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Pain Management With Nonopioid Analgesics and TechniquesJAMA Surgery, 2017
- Length of stay and risk of very early readmission in acute heart failureEuropean Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017
- Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramSurgery, 2016
- Implementation Costs of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in the United States: A Financial Model and Sensitivity Analysis Based on Experiences at a Quaternary Academic Medical CenterJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2016
- Organizational Culture Changes Result in Improvement in Patient-Centered Outcomes: Implementation of an Integrated Recovery Pathway for Surgical PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015
- Surgical Site Infections in a "High Outlier" InstitutionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009