Fitness for practice in nursing and midwifery education in Scotland, United Kingdom
Authors:
- Karen HollandKHKaren Holland
- Michelle RoxburghMRMichelle Roxburgh
- Martin JohnsonMJMartin Johnson
- Keith ToppingKeith Topping
- Roger WatsonRWRoger Watson
- William LauderWLWilliam Lauder
- Mary PorterMPMary Porter
- 12 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Vol. 19 (3-4) , 461-469
Abstract
Aim. The aim of this paper is to report findings from a major study that evaluated the Fitness for Practice nursing and midwifery curriculum in Scotland, UK.Background. The competence of student nurses and midwives at the point of registration has been the focus of debate and research. However, no major study, on such a large scale, had specifically evaluated pre‐registration programmes to determine whether they enabled students to achieve ‘fitness to practice’.Design. The study had a broad evaluation design conducted in three phases using a mixed methodology.Method. Phase 1 involved questionnaires, Objective Structured Clinical Examination's (OSCE) and curriculum evaluation. Phase 2 involved semi‐structured interviews (some telephone) and focus groups across main stakeholders: students (n = 78), mentors (n = 78), practice‐education facilitators (n = 24), academics (n = 59), senior clinical (n = 46) and education managers (n = 16), service users and carers (n = 10).Results. The findings suggest that the Fitness for Practice curriculum model in Scotland has on the whole been successful. The key finding is the predominant opinion of stakeholders that newly qualified nurses and midwives are perceived as being fit for practice at the point of registration. A perceived lack of confidence is, as with all transitions to new roles, an understandable outcome.Conclusions. Previous concern that student nurses and midwives are not ‘fit for practice’ has focused on the perceived lack of clinical skills at the point of registration, not on competence to practice in general. This study demonstrates that this is an important distinction and recognises that registration is only the beginning of a life long learning experience.Relevance to clinical practice. Students need to be supported to develop their confidence following registration as well as additional skills in their chosen field of practice. Appropriate mentorship and a period of preceptorship should be in place to accommodate this.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Don’t rock the boat’: Nursing students’ experiences of conformity and complianceNurse Education Today, 2009
- A review of curriculum evaluation in United Kingdom nursing educationNurse Education Today, 2008
- An evaluation of fitness for practice curricula: self‐efficacy, support and self‐reported competence in preregistration student nurses and midwivesJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2008
- Belongingness: A prerequisite for nursing students’ clinical learningNurse Education in Practice, 2008
- Measuring competence, self-reported competence and self-efficacy in pre-registration studentsNursing Standard, 2008
- Fit for practice? An exploration of the development of newly qualified nurses using focus groupsInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2007
- Discursive influences on clinical teaching in Australian undergraduate nursing programsNurse Education Today, 2004
- The origins of current nurse education policy and its implications for nurse educatorsNurse Education Today, 2004
- Clinical environment as a learning environment: student nurses’ perceptions concerning clinical learning experiencesNurse Education Today, 2003
- RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN UK NURSE EDUCATION: HORSES FOR COURSES OR COURSES FOR HORSES?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000