Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
Open Access
- 15 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-14
Abstract
There is an important need to evaluate whether rehabilitation services effectively address the needs of minority culture populations with North America’s increasingly diverse population. The objective of this paper was therefore to review and assess the state of knowledge of barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services. Our scoping review focused on cultural competence in rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation services included in this review were: audiology, speech-language pathology, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy. A search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles published from inception of databases until April 2015. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers according to specific eligibility criteria with the use of a liberal-accelerated approach. Full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria were then screened. Key study characteristics were abstracted by the first reviewer, and findings were verified by the second reviewer. After duplicates were removed, 4303 citations were screened. Included articles suggest that studies on cultural competence occur most frequently in occupational therapy (n = 17), followed by speech language pathology (n = 11), physiotherapy (n = 6), and finally audiology (n = 1). Primary barriers in rehabilitation services include language barriers, limited resources, and cultural barriers. Primary facilitators include cultural awareness amongst practitioners, cultural awareness in services, and explanations of health care systems. To our knowledge, this review is the first to summarize barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation fields. Insufficient studies were found to draw any conclusions with regards to audiological services. Minimal perspectives based on patient/caregiver experiences in all rehabilitation fields underscore a research gap. Future studies should aim to explore both patient/caregiver and practitioner perspectives as such data can help inform culturally competent practices.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barriers to Health Care among Asian Immigrants in the United States: A Traditional ReviewJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 2013
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Establishing a new journal for systematic review productsSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Developing Culturally Responsive Approaches With Southeast Asian American Families Experiencing Developmental DisabilitiesPediatrics, 2010
- Culturally responsive caring in occupational therapyOccupational Therapy International, 2007
- Relationships: the key to effective occupational therapy practice with urban Australian Indigenous childrenOccupational Therapy International, 2007
- Diversity in occupational therapy: Experiences of consumers who identify themselves as minority group membersAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2006
- The Role of Mexican Immigrant Mothers' Beliefs on Parental Involvement in Speech—Language TherapyCommunication Disorders Quarterly, 2006
- Defining Cultural Competence: A Practical Framework for Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health and Health CarePublic Health Reports®, 2003
- Relationships Between Physiotherapists' Level of Contact, Cultural Awareness and Communication with Bangladeshi Patients in Two Health AuthoritiesPhysiotherapy, 1995