Characterizing college science instruction: The Three-Dimensional Learning Observation Protocol
Open Access
- 16 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (6) , e0234640
Abstract
The importance of improving STEM education is of perennial interest, and to this end, the education community needs ways to characterize transformation efforts. Three-dimensional learning (3DL) is one such approach to transformation, in which core ideas of the discipline, scientific practices, and crosscutting concepts are combined to support student development of disciplinary expertise. We have previously reported on an approach to the characterization of assessments, the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), that can be used to identify whether assessments have the potential to engage students in 3DL. Here we present the development of a companion, the Three-Dimensional Learning Observation Protocol (3D-LOP), an observation protocol that can reliably distinguish between instruction that has potential for engagement with 3DL and instruction that does not. The 3D-LOP goes beyond other observation protocols, because it is intended not only to characterize the pedagogical approaches being used in the instructional environment, but also to identify whether students are being asked to engage with scientific practices, core ideas, and crosscutting concepts. We demonstrate herein that the 3D-LOP can be used reliably to code for the presence of 3DL; further, we present data that show the utility of the 3D-LOP in differentiating between instruction that has the potential to promote 3DL from instruction that does not. Our team plans to continue using this protocol to evaluate outcomes of instructional transformation projects. We also propose that the 3D-LOP can be used to support practitioners in developing curricular materials and selecting instructional strategies to promote engagement in three-dimensional instruction.Keywords
Funding Information
- Office of the Provost, Michigan State University
- Division of Undergraduate Education (1725395)
- Division of Undergraduate Education (1725520)
- Division of Undergraduate Education (1725609)
- Division of Undergraduate Education (1726360)
- Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (2012PG-EDU005 granted by Association of American Universities)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Ask Why?Journal of Chemical Education, 2015
- Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014
- Designing Assessment Tools To Measure Students’ Conceptual Knowledge of Chemistry2014
- The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom PracticesCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2013
- Chemistry, Life, the Universe, and Everything: A New Approach to General Chemistry, and a Model for Curriculum ReformJournal of Chemical Education, 2013
- Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literatureJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011
- Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive SkillsCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2010
- Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation ProtocolSchool Science and Mathematics, 2002
- Student resources for learning introductory physicsAmerican Journal of Physics, 2000
- Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in TeachingEducational Researcher, 1986