The Breivik case and what psychiatrists can learn from it
Author:
Open Access
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in World Psychiatry
- Vol. 12 (1) , 16-21
Abstract
In the afternoon of July 22, 2011, Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik killed 77 persons, many of them children and youths, in two separate events. On August 24, 2012, he was sentenced to 21 years in prison. Breivik went through two forensic evaluations: the first concluded that he had a psychotic disorder, thus being legally unaccountable, whereas the second concluded that he had a personality disorder, thus being legally accountable. This article first describes Breivik's background and his crimes. This is followed by an overview of the two forensic evaluations, their methods, contents and disagreements, and how these issues were handled by the court in the verdict. Finally, the article focuses on some lessons psychiatrists can take from the case.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first‐admission hospital sampleWorld Psychiatry, 2012
- Punishment, treatment and fair retributionTidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 2012
- Anders Breivik, the public, and psychiatryThe Lancet, 2012
- The shootings in Oslo and Utøya island July 22, 2011: Lessons for the International EMS communityScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Scandinavian forensic psychiatric practices – an overview and evaluationNordic Journal of Psychiatry, 2005
- Pseudologia fantastica and factitious disorder: Review of the literature and a case reportComprehensive Psychiatry, 1999