Redistributive land reform in ‘public’ (forest) lands? Lessons from the Philippines and their implications for land reform theory and practice
Author:
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Progress in Development Studies
- Vol. 6 (2) , 123-145
Abstract
The conventional view in the land reform literature does not consider distribution of ‘public’ lands to landless and near-landless peasants as redistributive land reform. Questioning the (formal) private property bias in land reform theory and practice, this paper rethinks some fundamental concepts and re-examines actual distribution in public lands in the Philippines. It concludes that redistributive reform can, in fact, occur in this type of land and the political process through which this outcome can be achieved could be highly contentious.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inclusion-exclusion in public policies and policy analyses: the case of Philippine land reform, 1972-2002Journal of International Development, 2003
- Poverty and the Distribution of LandJournal of Agrarian Change, 2002
- Legal Pluralism and Social Justice in Economic and Political DevelopmentIDS Bulletin, 2001
- Survival of an imperfect democracy in the PhilippinesDemocratization, 1999
- Agroindustry and contract farmers in upland West JavaThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1997
- Images of Community: Discourse and Strategy in Property RelationsDevelopment and Change, 1996
- Managing the ‘main force’: The communist party and the peasantry in the PhilippinesThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1995
- Claiming the land: Take‐overs by villagers in the Philippines with comparisons to Indonesia, Peru, Portugal, and RussiaThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1993
- The peasant movement and the challenge of rural democratisation in the PhilippinesThe Journal of Development Studies, 1990
- PEASANT LAND OCCUPATIONSPast & Present, 1974