Keeping Score under a Global Payment System
Author:
- 2 February 2012
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 366 (5) , 393-395
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that continued growth in health care spending is threatening the viability of the U.S. health care system. Although there are no clear comprehensive solutions to this problem, most observers see payment reform as the next best hope for reining in out-of-control costs. Our current fee-for-service payment system provides incentives to physicians to increase the delivery of services, which results in excessive utilization. Moreover, neither individual physicians nor the patients receiving the services bear the brunt of these utilization decisions. Rather, they're reflected in ever-rising health insurance premiums or tax-financed government expenditures shared by all. Many observers are therefore calling for fundamental redesign of the ways in which physicians and hospitals are compensated for the care they provide. Most options call for bundling payments to physicians; specific approaches range from prospective payments for discrete episodes of care (e.g., coronary-artery bypass surgery) to global payment or risk-based models of care.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Care Spending and Quality in Year 1 of the Alternative Quality ContractNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Medical Group Responses To Global Payment: Early Lessons From The ‘Alternative Quality Contract’ In MassachusettsHealth Affairs, 2011
- Primary Care and Accountable Care — Two Essential Elements of Delivery-System ReformNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009