Estimating fine‐scale movement rates and habitat preferences using multiple data sources
Authors:
- James T. ThorsonJTJames T. Thorson
- Steven J. BarbeauxSBSteven J. Barbeaux
- Daniel R. GoethelDGDaniel R. Goethel
- Kelly A. KearneyKKKelly A. Kearney
- Edward A. LamanELEdward A. Laman
- Julie K. NielsenJNJulie K. Nielsen
- Matthew R. SiskeyMSMatthew R. Siskey
- Kevin SiwickeKSKevin Siwicke
- Grant G. ThompsonGTGrant G. Thompson
- 3 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Fish and Fisheries
- Vol. 22 (6) , 1359-1376
Abstract
Fisheries scientists and managers must track rapid shifts in fish spatial distribution to mitigate stakeholder conflict and optimize survey designs, and these spatial shifts result in part from animal movement. Information regarding animal movement can be obtained from selection experiments, tagging studies, flux through movement gates (e.g. acoustic arrays), fishery catch‐per‐unit effort (CPUE), resource surveys and genetic/chemical markers. However, there are few accessible approaches to combine these data types while accounting for spatially correlated residual patterns. We therefore discuss a movement model involving diffusion (random movement), taxis (movement towards preferred habitat) and advection (passive drift following ocean currents). We specifically outline how these movement processes can be fitted to data while discretizing space and time and estimating non‐linear habitat preferences using environmental layers as well as spatial process errors. Finally, we introduce an R package, ATM, by fitting the model to bottom trawl survey, longline fishery and tagging data for Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus, Gadidae) in the Bering Sea during winter/summer seasons from 1982 to 2019. Combining data types predicts an increasing proportion of cod residing in the northern Bering Sea from 2013 to 2019, and estimates are informative in a recent stock assessment model. We fit sensitivity analyses by dropping tag, survey or fishery data, and this analysis shows that tagging data are necessary to identify diffusion rates, while survey data are informative about movement among biogeographic strata. This “hybrid” species distribution model can help explain poleward movement, project distributions under future climate conditions and evaluate alternative tag‐deployment scenarios to optimize tagging designs.Keywords
Funding Information
- Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (NA15OAR4320063)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marine Taxa Track Local Climate VelocitiesScience, 2013
- A review of integrated analysis in fisheries stock assessmentFisheries Research, 2013
- Learning a Potential Function From a Trajectory2011
- A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement researchProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- A spatial ecosystem and populations dynamics model (SEAPODYM) – Modeling of tuna and tuna-like populationsProgress in Oceanography, 2008
- Improving light and temperature based geolocation by unscented Kalman filteringFisheries Research, 2008
- Proximity of Pacific cod to the sea floor: Using archival tags to estimate fish availability to research bottom trawlsFisheries Research, 2007
- Density-dependent habitat selection in marine flatfish: the dynamic role of ontogeny and temperatureMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2007
- Approximate Bayesian Inference in Conditionally Independent Hierarchical Models (Parametric Empirical Bayes Models)Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- Diagnostic checks of non‐standard time series modelsJournal of Forecasting, 1985