Antimicrobial Treatment for Viral and Related Infections
Author:
- Maxwell FinlandMFMaxwell Finland
- 28 August 1952
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 247 (9) , 317-325
Abstract
BEFORE the introduction of aureomycin it was generally conceded that the so-called primary atypical or "viral" pneumonias were not benefited by the available antimicrobial agents.1 Indeed, the failure of a patient with an acute pulmonary infection to respond favorably to treatment with sulfonamides and penicillin was often accepted as one of the major criteria for the diagnosis of primary atypical pneumonia, provided that evidence for the presence of a definite inciting cause or agent could not be demonstrated. With the establishment of effectiveness of aureomycin and chloramphenicol against rickettsial infections and against infections with organisms of the psittacosis-lymphogranuloma-venereum-trachoma group,2 , 3 it . . .Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pneumonia in West London, 1949-1950BMJ, 1951
- An Evaluation of Aureomycin Therapy in Primary Atypical PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1950
- CHEMOTHERAPY OF VIRUS AND RICKETTSIAL INFECTIONSAnnual Review of Microbiology, 1950
- Treatment of primary atypical pneumonia with aureomycinThe American Journal of Medicine, 1950
- CHLOROMYCETIN AND AUREOMYCIN: THERAPEUTIC RESULTSAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1949
- THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF ATYPICAL OR VIRUS PNEUMONIAAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1949
- Aureomycin in the Treatment of Primary Atypical PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1949
- TREATMENT OF PRIMARY ATYPICAL NONBACTERIAL PNEUMONIA WITH AUREOMYCINJAMA, 1949
- Aureomycin in the treatment of primary atypical pneumoniaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1949
- THE VIRAL PNEUMONIAS AND PNEUMONIAS OF PROBABLE VIRAL ORIGINMedicine, 1947