The value of brain age as a transdiagnostic biomarker of neurodegeneration
Authors:
- Lonneke BosLBLonneke Bos
- David R. van NederpeltDNDavid R. van Nederpelt
- James H. ColeJCJames H. Cole
- Bas JasperseBJBas Jasperse
- Alle Meije WinkAWAlle Meije Wink
- Mario TranfaMTMario Tranfa
- Eva StrijbisESEva Strijbis
- Joep KillesteinJKJoep Killestein
- Bernard M.J. UitdehaagBUBernard M.J. Uitdehaag
- Frederik BarkhofFBFrederik Barkhof
- Hugo VrenkenHVHugo Vrenken
- Menno M. SchoonheimMSMenno M. Schoonheim
Preprint
Abstract
Progressive structural brain changes are a hallmark of neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) has emerged as a promising biomarker to quantify these alterations, yet its unique clinical contribution relative to conventional measures of global brain atrophy such as the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) remains underexplored. In this transdiagnostic study across AD, FTD, MS, and PD, we systematically evaluated brain-PAD’s capacity to distinguish patients from controls, its cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with cognition, and its voxel-wise structural correlates. We benchmarked brain-PAD against BPF to determine its added explanatory value. Brain-PAD successfully distinguished patients from controls, adding to BPF alone, in AD, FTD, and MS, but not PD. Across disorders, higher brain-PAD correlated with worse cognition, showing clear added value beyond BPF particularly in AD and MS. Baseline brain-PAD also independently predicted subsequent cognitive changes in AD, FTD, and MS, over and above BPF. Voxel-wise analyses revealed spatial features underlying brain-PAD including, beyond global tissue loss, specific regional atrophy matching each disease’s characteristic pattern. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that brain-PAD is a clinically meaningful, transdiagnostic biomarker of neurodegeneration that complements conventional volumetric measures like the BPF.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of accelerated brain aging on coactivation pattern dynamics in Parkinson's diseaseJournal of Neuroscience Research, 2024
- Brain structure ages—A new biomarker for multi‐disease classificationHuman Brain Mapping, 2024
- Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of accuracy and test–retest reliability of publicly available software packagesHuman Brain Mapping, 2023
- Multisitetest–retestreliability and compatibility of brain metrics derived fromFreeSurferversions 7.1, 6.0, and 5.3Human Brain Mapping, 2022
- Assessment of brain age in posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA PTSD and brain age working groupsBrain and Behavior, 2021
- Longitudinal Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis with the Brain‐Age ParadigmAnnals of Neurology, 2020
- Neuroimaging Studies Illustrate the Commonalities Between Ageing and Brain DiseasesBioEssays, 2018
- Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injuryAnnals of Neurology, 2015
- Brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in early Parkinson's diseaseMovement Disorders, 2009
- Neocortical neuron number in humans: Effect of sex and ageJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1997