Cross‐sector pre‐registration trainee pharmacist placements in general practice across England: A qualitative study exploring the views of pre‐registration trainees and education supervisors
Open Access
- 15 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health & Social Care in the Community
- Vol. 30 (6) , 2330-2340
Abstract
The Pharmacy Integration Fund commissioned 95 cross‐sector pre‐registration trainee pharmacist placements across England, which incorporated trainees spending 3–6 months in general practice (GP), whilst employed in hospital or community pharmacy. Delivery models varied (blocks or split weeks/days); trainees had pharmacist tutors at the employing/base (hospital/community pharmacy) organisation and in GP. This study aimed to evaluate implementation of cross‐sector pre‐registration placements, and to identify barriers and enablers of a “successful” placement that achieved its intended outcomes. A qualitative study was undertaken, using semi‐structured interviews with triads/dyads of trainee and pharmacist tutors at base and/or GP site. Interviews explored trainees’ and tutors’ GP placement experiences, and the contribution of GP placements to achieving intended learning outcomes. Data were thematically analysed. Thirty‐four interviews (14 trainees, 11 base tutors, 9 GP tutors) were completed in 11 study sites (5 GP/hospital; 6 GP/community pharmacy). GP placements were perceived as valuable and producing well‐rounded pre‐registration trainees with a good understanding of two settings. Key benefits of GP placements were trainees’ ability to work within multidisciplinary teams, and improved clinical and consultation skills. Contingency planning/flexibility was important when setting up cross‐sector placements. GP tutor supervision which supported a gradual transition from shadowing to more independent clinical practice with feedback was perceived as valuable. Good collaboration between tutors at the base and GP site ensured joined‐up learning across settings. All participants considered 13 weeks in GP an appropriate minimum duration; community trainees preferred longer duration (26 weeks) for more opportunities for clinical and consultation skills learning. Base and GP tutors would welcome clarity on which pre‐registration competencies should be achieved in GP placements, which would also aid quality and consistency across providers. Findings from this study identified key attributes of a successful pre‐registration cross‐sector training experience. These findings can inform policy reforms including changes to initial education and training of pharmacists.Keywords
Funding Information
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fitness for purpose of pharmacy technician education and training: The case of Great BritainResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2017
- Using longitudinal mixed methods to study the development of professional behaviours during pharmacy work-based trainingHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2016
- CLINICAL PHARMACISTS: PRACTITIONERS WHO ARE ESSENTIAL MEMBERS OF YOUR CLINICAL CARE TEAMRevista Médica Clínica Las Condes, 2016
- Case-Based Teaching for Interprofessional Postgraduate Trainees in Adolescent HealthJournal of Adolescent Health, 2016
- Exploring the process of professional socialisation and development during pharmacy pre-registration training in EnglandInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2016
- Pharmacy Practice in AustraliaThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2015
- A review of longitudinal community and hospital placements in medical education: BEME Guide No. 26Medical Teacher, 2013
- Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agendaMedical Education, 2011
- Pharmacy Education in the United KingdomAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2008
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006