Oral Reading Accuracy: Findings and Implications From Recent Research
Authors:
- Emily RodgersEREmily Rodgers
- Jerome V. D'AGostinoJDJerome V. D'AGostino
- Robert H. KellyRKRobert H. Kelly
- Clara MikitaCMClara Mikita
- 29 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Reading Teacher
- Vol. 72 (2) , 149-157
Abstract
The three accuracy ranges for oral reading—easy, instructional level, and hard—are familiar to almost everyone who teaches young students just learning to read. It may come as a surprise to learn, then, that no study has yet been conducted with beginning readers to support our well‐accepted views about accuracy ranges and their role in reading development. What accuracy range is optimal? Does it really matter if a student reads with less than 90% accuracy? In this article, the authors share what they learned when they explored these questions about oral reading accuracy and student progress.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling the Connections Between Word Recognition and Reading2013
- The Role of Reading Rate in the Informal Assessment of Reading AbilityLiteracy Research and Instruction, 2012
- Guided Reading: The Romance and the RealityThe Reading Teacher, 2012
- Validating Craft KnowledgeThe Elementary School Journal, 2011
- Fluency-Oriented Reading InstructionJournal of Literacy Research, 2005
- Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003
- The Interactive Strategies approach to reading interventionContemporary Educational Psychology, 2002
- Effect of Difficulty Levels on Second-Grade Delayed Readers Using Dyad ReadingThe Journal of Educational Research, 2000
- A COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS OF DETERMINING INSTRUCTIONAL READING LEVELSReading Psychology, 1987
- An Experimental Study of Effective Teaching in First-Grade Reading GroupsThe Elementary School Journal, 1979