Students’ Use and Attitudes Toward Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study Between the UK and China
Open Access
- 1 January 2025
- conference paper
- Published by HICSS Conference Office
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a focal point in higher education worldwide. Research has demonstrated its potential to enhance student learning, particularly for those disadvantaged in traditional educational contexts. However, concerns regarding fairness, transparency, and the ethical use of technology underscore the importance of developing evidence-based guidelines and policies for governing generative AI. While global efforts have been made to create policies and support the ethical use of these tools, there remains a lack of data on student usage and attitudes toward generative AI tools to inform such policy-making. Specifically, the absence of cross-national perspectives on student use poses risks of widening the existing digital divide when implementing guidelines established by leading organizations, which often lack the voices of Global South contexts. Our study aims to use a cross-national survey to examine the current practices of GenAI in various national contexts. We are collecting data from several countries. So far, we have collected data from China (Hong Kong and Macau) and the UK and this paper reports the results from two countries. Our findings highlight three main themes comparing students' use and attitudes toward generative AI in learning between the UK and China: types of tools used, students’ primary uses of the tools and associated concerns, and students’ attitudes toward using the tools. Our results offer valuable insights into student use of generative AI worldwide and conclude with practical recommendations for policymakers and educational practitioners in the field of generative AI in higher education.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- ChatGPT and the digitisation of writingHumanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2024
- Automated writing evaluation systems: A systematic review of Grammarly, Pigai, and Criterion with a perspective on future directions in the age of generative artificial intelligenceEducation and Information Technologies, 2024
- Examining the use of ChatGPT in public universities in Hong Kong: a case study of restricted access areasDiscover Education, 2024
- Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schoolsFuture in Educational Research, 2023
- OpenAI — explain why some countries are excluded from ChatGPTNature, 2023
- Generation Z use of artificial intelligence products and its impact on environmental sustainability: A cross-cultural comparisonComputers in Human Behavior, 2023
- Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing ClassJournal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 2022
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for English Writing: Introducing Wordtune as a Digital Writing Assistant for EFL WritersRELC Journal, 2022
- The changing patterns of international student mobility: a network perspectiveJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2020