Is the Power Threshold of 0.8 Applicable to Surgical Science?—Empowering the Underpowered Study

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:

• A Proposal to Mitigate the Consequences of Type 2 Error in Surgical Science
  Annals of Surgery, 2018
• Are Surgical Trials with Negative Results Being Interpreted Correctly?
  Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2013
• Demystifying sample-size calculation for clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research: the impact of low-event frequency in surgical clinical research
  Surgical Endoscopy, 2012
• Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions
  Annals of Surgery, 2010
• Brief Report: Post Hoc Power, Observed Power, A Priori Power, Retrospective Power, Prospective Power, Achieved Power: Sorting Out Appropriate Uses of Statistical Power Analyses
  Communication Methods and Measures, 2007
• Why Should Surgeons Care about Clinical Research Methodology?
  Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
• Sample size calculations in surgery: Are they done correctly?
  Surgery, 2003
• The Prevalence of Negative Studies with Inadequate Statistical Power
  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2002
• Negative Results of Randomized Clinical Trials Published in the Surgical Literature
  Archives of Surgery, 2001
• The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control Trial
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1978