Trait hierarchies are stronger than trait dissimilarities in structuring spatial co‐occurrence patterns of common tree species in a subtropical forest
Open Access
- 1 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 11 (12) , 7366-7377
Abstract
The dissimilarity and hierarchy of trait values that characterize niche and fitness differences, respectively, have been increasingly applied to infer mechanisms driving community assembly and to explain species co‐occurrence patterns. Here, we predict that limiting similarity should result in the spatial segregation of functionally similar species, while functionally similar species will be more likely to co‐occur either due to environmental filtering or due to competitive exclusion of inferior competitors (hereafter hierarchical competition). We used a fully mapped 50‐ha subtropical forest plot in southern China to explore how pairwise spatial associations between saplings and between adult trees were influenced by trait dissimilarity and hierarchy in order to gain insight into assembly mechanisms. We assessed pairwise spatial associations using two summary statistics of spatial point patterns at different spatial scales and compared the effects of trait dissimilarity and trait hierarchy of different functional traits on the interspecific spatial associations. These comparisons allow us to disentangle the effects of limiting similarity, environmental filtering, and hierarchical competition on species co‐occurrence. We found that trait dissimilarity was generally negatively related to interspecific spatial associations for both saplings and adult trees across spatial scales, meaning that species with similar trait values were more likely to co‐occur and thus supporting environmental filtering or hierarchical competition. We further found that trait hierarchy outweighed trait dissimilarity in structuring pairwise spatial associations, suggesting that hierarchical competition played a more important role in structuring our forest community than environmental filtering across life stages. This study employed a novel method, by offering the integration of pairwise spatial association and trait dissimilarity as well as trait hierarchy, to disentangle the relative importance of multiple assembly mechanisms in structuring co‐occurrence patterns, especially the mechanisms of environmental filtering and hierarchical competition, which lead to indistinguishable co‐occurrence patterns. This study also reinforced the importance of trait hierarchy rather than trait dissimilarity in driving neighborhood competition.Keywords
Funding Information
- China Scholarship Council
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 31901107)
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant NO. 2018A030310384)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Contribution of Rare Species to Community Phylogenetic Diversity across a Global Network of Forest PlotsThe American Naturalist, 2012
- Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species' trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assemblyEcology Letters, 2012
- More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental testProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biologyEcology Letters, 2009
- Species Associations in a Heterogeneous Sri Lankan Dipterocarp ForestThe American Naturalist, 2007
- A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within‐ and among‐community componentsEcology Letters, 2007
- Untangling an Entangled BankScience, 2005
- Short Communication: Leaf trait relationships in Australian plant speciesFunctional Plant Biology, 2004
- Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between SpeciesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2002
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000