Rethinking Bestiality:
Author:
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theoretical Criminology
- Vol. 1 (3) , 317-340
Abstract
This paper seeks to introduce a view of bestiality which differs radically from both the anthropocentrism enshrined in the dogma of Judaeo-Christianity and also from the pseudo-liberal tolerance fashionable today. I argue that bestiality should be understood as `interspecies sexual assault' because the situation of animals as abused victims parallels that of women and, to some extent, that of infants and children and further because (1) human-animal sexual relations almost always involve coercion; (2) such practices often cause animals pain and even death; and (3) animals are unable either to communicate consent to us in a form that we can readily understand or to speak out about their abuse. The paper offers a typology of interspecies sexual assault, including sexual fixation, commodification, adolescent sexual experimentation and aggravated cruelty.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Children Who are Cruel to Animals: A Review of Research and Implications for Developmental PsychopathologyAnthrozoös, 1993
- Behavior Problems in Sexually Abused Young ChildrenJournal of Pediatric Psychology, 1986
- JEREMY BENTHAM'S ESSAY ON ”PAEDERASTY”Journal of Homosexuality, 1978
- What Is It Like to Be a Bat?Philosophical Review, 1974
- Animal Liberation1973
- Children who are cruel to animalsChild Psychiatry & Human Development, 1971
- Characteristics of Animals1958
- A Comparative Study of Deviations from Sexual MoresAmerican Sociological Review, 1952