Disciplining ‘Problem Parents’ in the Youth Court: Between Regulation and Resistance
Author:
- 9 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Policy and Society
- Vol. 9 (1) , 89-99
Abstract
This paper explores the ways in which parents, who have been the recipients of Parenting Orders, perform identity work through their accounts of their experiences in court. Discourse analysis is used to identify five key ‘strategies of resistance’ through which parents manage their parental identity and argues that such discursive practices highlight the fragility of such parents' claims to a positive parental identity in light of hegemonic gendered and classed conceptions of ‘responsible parenting’. The paper concludes by reflecting on what such practices might mean for parents who find themselves at once both regulated and resistant.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- (En)Gendering Responsibilities: Experiences of Parenting a ‘Young Offender’The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 2009
- Do We Need a ‘Naughty Step’? Rethinking the Parenting Order After Ten YearsThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 2008
- “Chav Mum Chav Scum”Feminist Media Studies, 2008
- Punishing ‘Poor Parents’: ‘Respect’, ‘Responsibility’ and Parenting Orders in ScotlandYouth Justice, 2007
- Power, Adaptation and Resistance in a Late-Modern Men’s PrisonThe British Journal of Criminology, 2007
- Punishing Parents for the Crimes of their ChildrenThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 2005
- Joined-Up Services to Tackle Youth Crime: A Case-Study in EnglandThe British Journal of Criminology, 2004
- EditorialYouth Justice, 2002
- Youth Crime, the ‘Parenting Deficit’ and State Intervention: A Contextual CritiqueYouth Justice, 2002
- ‘Some Mothers Do ‘Ave ‘Em’: Backlash and the gender politics of the underclass debateJournal of Gender Studies, 1994