THE CHALLENGE OF REVENUE SHARING WITH BUNDLED PRICING: AN APPLICATION TO MUSIC
- 18 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 51 (2) , 1155-1165
Abstract
Although bundling can substantially increase profits relative to standalone pricing, particularly for zero‐marginal‐cost information products, it has one major problem: bundling produces revenue that is not readily attributable to particular pieces of intellectual property, creating a revenue division problem. We evaluate several possible solutions using unique song valuation survey data. We find the Shapley value, a well‐motivated theoretical solution, is universally incentive compatible (all bundle elements fare better inside the bundle than under standalone pricing), but revenue‐sharing schemes feasible with readily available consumption data are not. Among feasible schemes, Ginsburgh and Zang's modified Shapley value performs best. (JEL C71, D79, L14)Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on samplingComputers & Operations Research, 2009
- The museum pass game and its valueGames and Economic Behavior, 2003
- Measuring Heterogeneous Reservation Prices for Product BundlesMarketing Science, 2003
- Sharing the Income of a Museum Pass ProgramMuseum Management and Curatorship, 2001
- Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits, and EfficiencyManagement Science, 1999
- Price Discrimination by a Many-Product FirmReview of Economic Studies, 1999
- Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- A comparison of ranking, rating and reservation price measurement in conjoint analysisMarketing Letters, 1991
- Optimal Bundle PricingManagement Science, 1990
- Commodity Bundling and the Burden of MonopolyThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976