Geographic Adaptation of Pretrained Language Models
Open Access
- 16 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MIT Press in Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
- Vol. 12, 411-431
Abstract
While pretrained language models (PLMs) have been shown to possess a plethora of linguistic knowledge, the existing body of research has largely neglected extralinguistic knowledge, which is generally difficult to obtain by pretraining on text alone. Here, we contribute to closing this gap by examining geolinguistic knowledge, i.e., knowledge about geographic variation in language. We introduce geoadaptation, an intermediate training step that couples language modeling with geolocation prediction in a multi-task learning setup. We geoadapt four PLMs, covering language groups from three geographic areas, and evaluate them on five different tasks: fine-tuned (i.e., supervised) geolocation prediction, zero-shot (i.e., unsupervised) geolocation prediction, fine-tuned language identification, zero-shot language identification, and zero-shot prediction of dialect features. Geoadaptation is very successful at injecting geolinguistic knowledge into the PLMs: The geoadapted PLMs consistently outperform PLMs adapted using only language modeling (by especially wide margins on zero-shot prediction tasks), and we obtain new state-of-the-art results on two benchmarks for geolocation prediction and language identification. Furthermore, we show that the effectiveness of geoadaptation stems from its ability to geographically retrofit the representation space of the PLMs.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- On cross-lingual retrieval with multilingual text encodersInformation Retrieval Journal, 2022
- Simultaneity and the refusal to choose: The semiotics of Serbian youth identity on FacebookLanguage in Society, 2019
- Visualizing Regional Language Variation Across Europe on Twitter2019
- Borders and boundaries in Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin and Serbian: Twitter data to the rescueJournal of Linguistic Geography, 2018
- Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysisComputers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2016
- Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialectsJournal of Phonetics, 2004
- Voice quality: Listener identification of African-American versus Caucasian speakersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- The effect of phonetic complexity on speaker race and sex identificationsJournal of Phonetics, 1979
- A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes ProblemPsychometrika, 1966
- Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or PercentagesPsychometrika, 1947