Device-related complications in a national pediatric cardiac implantable electronic device cohort stratified after age and implantation technique
- 29 March 2025
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Heart Rhythm
- Vol. 22 (8) , e416-e424
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Novo Nordisk Fonden
- Hjerteforeningen
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisPediatric Cardiology, 2023
- Longitudinal Outcomes of Epicardial and Endocardial Pacemaker Leads in the Adult Fontan PatientPediatric Cardiology, 2018
- Selecting the right defibrillator in the younger patient: Transvenous, epicardial or subcutaneous?International Journal of Cardiology, 2018
- Outcome in young patients with isolated complete atrioventricular block and permanent pacemaker treatment: A nationwide study of 127 patientsHeart Rhythm, 2015
- Complications and Risk Assessment of 25 Years in Pediatric PacingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2015
- Epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in adults with congenital heart diseaseJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2010
- Equivalent Performance of Epicardial Versus Endocardial Permanent Pacing in Children: A Single Institution and Manufacturer ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Predictors affecting durability of epicardial pacemaker leads in pediatric patientsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2008
- Long-Term Follow-Up After Pacemaker Implantation in Neonates and InfantsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Pacemaker implantation after congenital heart surgery: risk and prognosis in a population-based follow-up studyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2005