“This happens all the time”: a Qualitative Study of General Internists’ Experiences with Discriminatory Patients
- 29 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1553-1560
Abstract
Background Workplace discrimination negatively affects physicians of color personally and professionally. Although the occurrence of discrimination from patients has been visible in social media, popular press, and personal essays, scant research exists on patients as a source of discrimination directed at physicians of color. Objective To explore practicing general internists’ experiences observing or interacting with patients exhibiting discriminatory behavior directed at physicians of color. Design A qualitative study with in-depth, semi-structured, one-on-one telephone interviews conducted and recorded between May and September 2019. Participants A purposive sample of 24 general internists practicing at 12 academic health centers in the USA: 14 self-identified as White and 10 as a physician of color, which included Asian, Black, Native American, and self-identified other race. Approach Four coders analyzed the transcribed and verified interview text; thematic analysis was used to inductively identify cohesive themes and subthemes. Key Results Analyses revealed four major themes: (1) assumption that a legitimate doctor is White, male, and able-bodied; (2) legacy of the Black experience; (3) working through the struggle of discrimination; and (4) ethical dilemma of providing care to discriminatory patients. In addition to discrimination from patients based on a physician’s race or ethnicity, participants described experiencing or observing discrimination based on a physician’s gender and disability status. Participants generally expressed a need for greater support from colleagues and more guidance from institutional policies. Conclusions General internists practicing in academic settings reported observing or experiencing discrimination from patients based on the physician’s race, ethnicity, gender (or their intersection), and disability status and the ethical dilemma of providing care to such patients. These results contribute to growing evidence of the need for institutions to better support an increasingly diverse physician workforce with policies and specific guidance to help physicians respond to discrimination from patients while still providing quality care.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000427, TL1TR000429, TL1TR002375)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM122557)
- University of Wisconsin Department of Medicine
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Shapiro Scholars Program
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Promoting institutional change through bias literacy.Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2012
- Thematic analysis.2012
- Professional Challenges of Non-U.S.-Born International Medical Graduates and Recommendations for Support During Residency TrainingAcademic Medicine, 2011
- Race, Disadvantage and Faculty Experiences in Academic MedicineJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Professional Experiences of International Medical Graduates Practicing Primary Care in the United StatesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Race/Ethnicity and Workplace Discrimination: Results of a National Survey of PhysiciansJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice.American Psychologist, 2007
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?Field Methods, 2006
- Methodological rigour within a qualitative frameworkJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2004