Factors influencing maternal decision-making for the infant sleep environment in families at higher risk of SIDS: a qualitative study
Open Access
- 4 September 2017
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Paediatrics Open
- Vol. 1 (1) , e000133
Abstract
Objective Qualitative interviews with mothers of babies at higher risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) were carried out to understand their views and decision-making process on the infant sleep environment and safe sleep messages. Design and setting Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and November 2014 in deprived areas of Bristol, UK. Mothers were asked about their decision-making for the infant sleep environment and safe sleep messages including infant sleep position, co-sleeping, smoking, dummy use, feeding and disrupted routines. The interviews were transcribed, coded and thematic analysis carried out. Participants Participants were invited based on an algorithm developed in a previous SIDS case control study that identified an increased risk of SIDS from four demographic characteristics: young maternal age, smoking during pregnancy, three or more children, and a measure of deprivation. The presence of three, or more characteristics led to being invited to take part in the qualitative study. Results Factors influencing mothers’ adherence to the safe sleep messages included previous experience and the credibility of the advice given. They described disrupted routines that led to risky scenarios with a belief that occasional risks were acceptable. Where circumstances made following the advice more difficult they found alternative strategies to reduce the risk, including the use of movement monitors, regular checking and a belief that lighter maternal sleep in the presence of a baby was protective. Conclusions Safer sleep messages should be tailored to fit with the lived realities of mothers, especially those at higher risk. The traditional list of ‘do’s’ and ‘don’ts’ was not well accepted by this group. Interventions that seek to influence this higher-risk group should acknowledge mothers’ own protective instincts and consider their beliefs and understanding behind the safer sleep messages if they are to be effective and encourage this group to change.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Lullaby Trust
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mothers’ knowledge and attitudes to sudden infant death syndrome risk reduction messages: results from a UK surveyArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2017
- A qualitative study in parental perceptions and understanding of SIDS-reduction guidance in a UK bi-cultural urban communityBMC Pediatrics, 2016
- Sudden unexpected death in infancy: aetiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology and prevention in 2015Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2015
- African American’s Awareness of Disparities in Infant Mortality Rates and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome RisksJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 2010
- Hazardous cosleeping environments and risk factors amenable to change: case-control study of SIDS in south west EnglandBMJ, 2009
- Defining the Sudden Infant Death SyndromeArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2003
- Racial Disparity and Modifiable Risk Factors Among Infants Dying Suddenly and UnexpectedlyPediatrics, 2003
- The Black Infant’s Susceptibility to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Respiratory Infection in Late InfancyEpidemiology, 2001
- The changing epidemiology of SIDS following the national risk reduction campaignsPediatric Pulmonology, 1997
- Higher rates of SIDS persist in low income groupsJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1995