Surgical outcome of benign cases with pelvic adhesions undergoing robotic total hysterectomy
Open Access
- 6 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
- Vol. 85 (8) , 853-858
Abstract
Background: Robotic total hysterectomies have been considered contraindicated for patients with intra-abdominal adherences, but the evidence for this is not strong, and we hypothesized that the procedure can be of benefit even in these cases. In our research, we analyzed how the severity of pelvic adhesions affects robotic total hysterectomy, and by comparing different types of adhesions, we can further identify the outcomes differences in between, which may aid in future surgical decision making. Methods: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). All 410 patients with uterine myoma or adenomyosis undergoing robotic total hysterectomies between 2011 and 2016 using the da Vinci Si system by the same surgeon in Taipei Medical University Hospital were included in the study. Results: Baseline characteristics, blood loss, docking time, operation time, time to perform uterine artery ligation (UAL), pain score, hospital stay, complication rate, and laparotomy conversion rate were analyzed between benign cases with or without pelvic adhesions undergoing robotic total hysterectomy. Furthermore, in our subgroups analysis, we have divided the patients with adhesion into different groups according to the severity of adhesion. The abdomen and pelvic cavity was divided into nine sections, and the outcomes of different adhesion condition were compared. We found that patients with adhesions had increased docking time and operation time, but other differences between groups were not statistically significant. The results of the adhesion group showed no significant increases in blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Only significantly longer surgical time compared with the normal group was noted. Conclusion: Our results suggest that robotic total hysterectomies with UAL are effective and safe for patients with benign gynecologic conditions, and the surgical method should be considered even for patients with adhesion risks.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013
- Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic DiseaseJAMA, 2013
- Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the “ignored iceberg” of medicine and surgeryWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2013
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign DiseaseJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2013
- Robotic Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic HysterectomyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Comparing Robot-Assisted with Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Impact on Cost and Clinical OutcomesJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2010
- Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case–control studyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2010
- A Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy to Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy: Surgical Outcomes in a Community PracticeJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2008
- Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical SignificanceDigestive Surgery, 2001
- The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research StudyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2000