Screening for Substance Use in Rural Primary Care: a Qualitative Study of Providers and Patients
Open Access
- 14 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 34 (12) , 2824-2832
Abstract
Background Substance use frequently goes undetected in primary care. Though barriers to implementing systematic screening for alcohol and drug use have been examined in urban settings, less is known about screening in rural primary care. Objective To identify current screening practices, barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for the implementation of substance use screening in rural federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Design As part of a multi-phase study implementing electronic health record–integrated screening, focus groups (n = 60: all stakeholder groups) and individual interviews (n = 10 primary care providers (PCPs)) were conducted. Participants Three stakeholder groups (PCPs, medical assistants (MAs), and patients) at three rural FQHCs in Maine. Approach Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed. Themes surrounding current substance use screening practices, barriers to screening, and recommendations for implementation were identified and organized by the Knowledge to Action (KTA) Framework. Key Results Identifying the problem: Stakeholders unanimously agreed that screening is important, and that universal screening is preferred to targeted approaches. Adapting to the local context: PCPs and MAs agreed that screening should be done annually. Views were mixed regarding the delivery of screening; patients preferred self-administered, tablet-based screening, while MAs and PCPs were divided between self-administered and face-to-face approaches. Assessing barriers: For patients, barriers to screening centered around a perceived lack of rapport with providers, which contributed to concerns about trust, judgment, and privacy. For PCPs and MAs, barriers included lack of comfort, training, and preparedness to address screening results and offer treatment. Conclusions Though stakeholders agree on the importance of implementing universal screening, concerns about the patient-provider relationship, the consequences of disclosure, and privacy appear heightened by the rural context. Findings highlight that strong relationships with providers are critical for patients, while in-clinic resources and training are needed to increase provider comfort and preparedness to address substance use.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (UG1DA013035, UG1DA040309, T32-DA037202)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instrumental and socioemotional communications in doctor-patient interactions in urban and rural clinicsBMC Health Services Research, 2013
- Committee Opinion No. 524Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of useJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- The Overlapping Roles of the Rural DoctorAMA Journal of Ethics, 2011
- Addressing the primary care physician shortage in an evolving medical workforceInternational Archives of Medicine, 2009
- Research on Rural Residence and Access to Drug Abuse Services: Where Are We and Where Do We Go?The Journal of Rural Health, 2007
- Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2006
- Barriers to healthcare as reported by rural and urban interprofessional providersJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2006
- Ethical Considerations in Rural Health Care: A Pilot Study of Clinicians in Alaska and New MexicoCommunity Mental Health Journal, 2005
- Ethical issues in rural mental health practice.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1986