Effectiveness of nonpharmacological secondary prevention of coronary heart disease
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Vol. 17 (6) , 688-700
Abstract
To summarize the current evidence with regard to the effectiveness of nonpharmacological secondary prevention strategies of coronary heart disease (CHD) and to investigate the comparative effectiveness of interventions of different categories, specific intervention components and the effectiveness in patient subgroups. A structured search of databases and manual search were conducted. Clinical trials and meta-analyses published between January 2003 and September 2008 were included if they targeted adults with CHD, had a follow-up of at least 12 months, and reported mortality, cardiac events or quality of life. Two researchers assessed eligibility and methodological quality, in which appropriate, pooled effect estimates were calculated and tested in sensitivity analyses. Of 4798 publications 43 met the inclusion criteria. Overall study quality was satisfactory, but only about half of the studies reported mortality. Follow-up duration varied between 12 and 120 months. Despite substantial heterogeneity, there was strong evidence of intervention effectiveness overall. The evidence for exercise and multimodal interventions was more conclusive for reducing mortality, whereas psychosocial interventions seemed to be more effective in improving the quality of life. Rigorous studies investigating dietary and smoking cessation interventions, specific intervention components and important patient subgroups, were scarce. Nonpharmacological secondary prevention is safe and effective, with exercise and multimodal interventions reducing mortality most substantially. There is a lack of studies concerning dietary and smoking cessation interventions. In addition, intervention effectiveness in patient subgroups and of intervention components could not be evaluated conclusively. Future research should investigate these issues in rigorous studies with appropriate follow-up duration to improve the current poor risk factor control of CHD patients.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countriesThe Lancet, 2009
- Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsEuropean Heart Journal, 2008
- Comparison of Low-Fat Versus Mediterranean-Style Dietary Intervention After First Myocardial Infarction (from The Heart Institute of Spokane Diet Intervention and Evaluation Trial)††Conflicts of interest: Dr. Bibus has received consulting fees from companies that make fish oil, Coromega Co., Vista, CA, and Enreco, Inc., Newton, WI. He also has equity ownership in Lipid Technologies, LLC, Austin, MN, the company that performed the plasma fatty acid analysis. Dr. Bibus owns patents related to lipid therapy. He has served as an expert witness regarding lipids and fatty acids.The American Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- Comparative outcome one year after formal cardiac rehabilitation: the effects of a randomized intervention to improve exercise adherenceEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2008
- Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2007
- Efficacy of an intensive prevention program in coronary patients in primary care, a randomised clinical trialInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2007
- Home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: A systematic review and meta-analysisInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: Results of a randomized trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Lack of benefit of dietary advice to men with angina: results of a controlled trialEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986