Selecting the Optimal Oral Antihistamine for Patients with Allergic Rhinitis
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Drugs
- Vol. 66 (18) , 2309-2319
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is now recognised as a global health problem that affects 10–30% of adults and up to 40% of children. Each year, millions of patients seek treatment from their healthcare provider. However, the prevalence of AR maybe significantly underestimated because of misdiagnosis, under diagnosis and failure of patients to seek medical attention. In addition to the classical symptoms such as sneezing, nasal pruritus, congestion and rhinorrhoea, it is now recognised that AR has a significant impact on quality of life (QOL). This condition can lead to sleep disturbance as a result of nasal congestion, which leads to significant impairment in daily activities such as work and school. Traditionally, AR has been subdivided into seasonal AR (SAR) or perennial AR (PAR). SAR symptoms usually appear during a specific season in which aeroallergens are present in the outdoor air such as tree and grass pollen in the spring and summer and weed pollens in the autumn (fall); and PAR symptoms are present year-round and are triggered by dust mite, animal dander, indoor molds and cockroaches. Oral histamine H1-receptor antagonists (H1 antihistamines) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of AR. There are several oral H1 antihistamines available and it is important to know the pharmacology, such as administration interval, onset of action, metabolism and conditions that require administration adjustments. When prescribing oral H1 antihistamines, the healthcare provider must take into account the clinical efficacy and weigh this against the risk of adverse effects from the agent. In addition to the clinical efficacy, potential for improvement in QOL with a particular treatment should also be considered.Keywords
This publication has 106 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the Optimal Oral Antihistamine for Patients With Allergic RhinitisMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2005
- Second-Generation AntihistaminesDrugs, 2005
- The comparison of the efficacy and safety of cetirizine, oxatomide, ketotifen, and a placebo for the treatment of childhood perennial allergic rhinitisAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2002
- Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestionAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2002
- Quality of life in allergic rhinitisAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1999
- Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and onset of action of mizolastine, cetirizine, and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitisAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1999
- Once-daily fexofenadine HCl improves quality of life and reduces work and activity impairment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitisAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1999
- Central nervous system effects of H1-receptor antagonists in the elderlyAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1999
- Diagnosis and Management of Rhinitis: Complete Guidelines of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters in Allergy, Asthma and ImmunologyAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1998
- Inflammatory Mediators in Late Antigen-Induced RhinitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985