Probiotic and prebiotic interventions for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Authors:
- 16 November 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Beneficial Microbes
- Vol. 12 (6) , 517-530
Abstract
Many studies have associated altered intestinal bacterial communities and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but the putative effects are inconclusive. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through randomised intervention trials. Literature searches were performed until March 2020. For each outcome, a random NMA was performed, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was determined. A total of 22 randomised trials comparing prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic treatments included 1301 participants. Considering all seven results (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, body mass index, weight, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) together, the highest SUCRA values are probiotics (94%), synbiotics (61%) and prebiotics (56%), respectively. NMA results provide evidence that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics can alleviate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. However, due to the lack of high-quality randomised trials, this research also has some limitations.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATAPLOS ONE, 2013
- Molecular Characterization of the Fecal Microbiota in Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis – A Longitudinal StudyPLOS ONE, 2013
- Prospective histopathologic evaluation of lifestyle modification in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized trialTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 2013
- Human Fatty Liver Disease: Old Questions and New InsightsScience, 2011
- Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysesEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may misleadBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- The NAFLD fibrosis scoreHepatology, 2007
- Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariateStatistics in Medicine, 2003
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002