Performance of 16S rRNA Gene Next-Generation Sequencing and the Culture Method in the Detection of Bacteria in Clinical Specimens
Open Access
- 21 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 14 (13) , 1318
Abstract
Effective treatment of infectious diseases requires prompt and accurate bacterial identification and tailored antimicrobial treatments. Traditional culture methods are considered the gold standard, but their effectiveness diminishes for fastidious and hard-to-grow microorganisms. In recent years, molecular diagnostic tools such as 16S rRNA gene next-generation sequencing (16S NGS) have gained popularity in the field. We analysed data from samples submitted for 16S NGS between July 2022 and July 2023 at the Department of Advanced Translational Microbiology in Trieste, Italy. The study included samples submitted for both culture-based identification and 16S NGS. Conventional media were used for culture, and bacterial identification was performed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Ion PGM platform. Among the 123 samples submitted, drainage fluids (38%) and blood (23%) were the most common, with requests predominantly from the Infectious Diseases (31.7%) and Orthopedic (21.13%) Units. In samples collected from patients with confirmed infections, 16S NGS demonstrated diagnostic utility in over 60% of cases, either by confirming culture results in 21% or providing enhanced detection in 40% of instances. Among the 71 patients who had received antibiotic therapies before sampling (mean 2.3 prior antibiotic days), pre-sampling antibiotic consumption did not significantly affect the sensitivity of 16S NGS. In routine microbiology laboratories, combining 16S NGS with culture method enhances the sensitivity of microbiological diagnostics, even when sampling is conducted during antibiotic therapy.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance and Application of 16S rRNA Gene Cycle Sequencing for Routine Identification of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology LaboratoryClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2020
- Comparison of Bioinformatics Pipelines and Operating Systems for the Analyses of 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequences in Human Fecal SamplesFrontiers in Microbiology, 2020
- Comparison of 16S Ribosomal RNA Targeted Sequencing and Culture for Bacterial Identification in Normally Sterile Body Fluid Samples: Report of a 10-Year Clinical Laboratory ReviewAnnals of Laboratory Medicine, 2020
- Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Sepsis: A Comparison of Characteristics and OutcomesAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2019
- Next-Generation Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Challenging Culture-Negative EndocarditisFrontiers in Medicine, 2019
- Understanding and overcoming the pitfalls and biases of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods for use in the routine clinical microbiological diagnostic laboratoryEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2019
- The potential contribution of 16S ribosomal RNA polymerase chain reaction to antimicrobial stewardship in culture-negative infectionJournal of Hospital Infection, 2018
- Detection of bacterial pathogens from clinical specimens using conventional microbial culture and 16S metagenomics: a comparative studyBMC Infectious Diseases, 2017
- Impact of 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis for Identification of Bacteria on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious DiseasesClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2004
- Characteristics of Massilia timonae and Massilia timonae -Like Isolates from Human Patients, with an Emended Description of the SpeciesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003