Invasion success of three cool‐season grasses in the northern prairie: a test of three hypotheses
Authors:
- Cedric VillasorCVCedric Villasor
- Thomas BeckerTBThomas Becker
- James F. CahillJCJames F. Cahill
- Balázs DeákBDBalázs Deák
- Isabell HensenIHIsabell Hensen
- Rafael OtfinowskiRORafael Otfinowski
- Christoph RoscheCRChristoph Rosche
- Dariia BorovykDBDariia Borovyk
- Tatyana VakhlamovaTVTatyana Vakhlamova
- Orsolya ValkóOrsolya Valkó
- Viktoria WagnerVWViktoria Wagner
Open Access
Abstract
Empirical invasion ecology is laden with high context dependency. If general mechanisms underlying invasion success exist, they should be detectable in species that share biological and ecological characteristics. We carried out a growth experiment with Agropyron cristatum , Bromus inermis and Poa pratensis (subsp. angustifolia ), to better understand the mechanisms underlying the invasion success of cool‐season grasses in northern prairie grasslands of North America. By using a home–away approach, we tested whether 1) non‐native plants have a higher performance than native plants, and whether invasiveness is 2) mediated by interactions with soils, such as a release from pathogens or enhanced mutualism, or 3) an adaptation to local soils. We compared seed size and weight of populations in Canada (non‐native range) and Eurasia (native range) and carried out an experiment, in which seeds from the non‐native and native ranges were planted into sterilized soil (control) and soil from a population in Canada or Eurasia, or local soils, respectively. We found inconsistent effects across species and response variables. Seed size and weight were not significantly different between native and non‐native populations. The experiment showed a seed origin effect in A . cristatum (root and total biomass) and B . inermis (root biomass), with non‐native populations outperforming native ones. Soil‐mediated effects were supported in A . cristatum (root biomass) and local adaptation in B . inermis (root and total biomass). Germination across all species and biomass in P . pratensis did not respond to treatments. Despite the high similarity of our study group, our results indicate that invasiveness might be driven by idiosyncratic causes at the species level. Mechanisms not considered in our study, such as high propagule pressure and preadaptation could also potentially explain the invasion success across species.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plant-soil feedbacks do not explain invasion success of Acacia species in introduced range populations in AustraliaBiological Invasions, 2013
- Local adaptation across a fertility gradient is influenced by soil biota in the invasive grass, Bromus inermisEvolutionary Ecology, 2011
- Prevailing Negative Soil Biota Effect and No Evidence for Local Adaptation in a Widespread Eurasian GrassPLOS ONE, 2011
- Multiple common garden experiments suggest lack of local adaptation in an invasive ornamental plantJournal of Plant Ecology, 2011
- Plant–soil feedback: experimental approaches, statistical analyses and ecological interpretationsJournal of Ecology, 2010
- Hybridization and the evolution of invasiveness in plants and other organismsBiological Invasions, 2008
- The cultivation bias: different communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detected in roots from the field, from bait plants transplanted to the field, and from a greenhouse trap experimentMycorrhiza, 2007
- Soil biota and invasive plantsNew Phytologist, 2006
- Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populationsOecologia, 2005
- Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitionsDiversity and Distributions, 2000