Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trials
Authors:
- Michael B. BrackenMBMichael B. Bracken
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 47 (8) , 881-889
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Early versus delayed neonatal administration of a synthetic surfactant — the judgment of OSIRISThe Lancet, 1992
- Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1992
- Absolutely relative: How research results are summarized can affect treatment decisionsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Effects of two rescue doses of a synthetic surfactant on mortality rate and survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in 700- to 1350-gram infants with respiratory distress syndromeThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Indexes and boundaries for “quantitative significance” in statistical decisionsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- SEVERITY OF ANAEMIA AND OPERATIVE MORTALITY AND MORBIDITYThe Lancet, 1988
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986