Enhancing Breast Reconstruction with Bovine Pericardium: A Preliminary STEP (Surgical Techniques and Efficacy in Pericardium Use) Towards Improved Outcomes
Authors:
- Donato CasellaDCDonato Casella
- Nicola RoccoNicola Rocco
- Gianluigi LuridianaGLGianluigi Luridiana
- Marco MarcascianoMMMarco Marcasciano
- Irene ZeriniIZIrene Zerini
- Silvia SordiSSSilvia Sordi
- Alessandro NeriANAlessandro Neri
- Giuseppe CatanutoGCGiuseppe Catanuto
- Pietro Maria FerrandoPFPietro Maria Ferrando
- Juste KaciulyteJKJuste Kaciulyte
Open Access
- 6 September 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (17) , 6296
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In pre-pectoral breast reconstruction, both synthetic meshes (SM) and acellular dermis or pericardium matrixes (ADM/APM) present drawbacks that can be prevented with targeted device choosing. In daily practice, the authors wrap the implant with a human-derived ADM (hADM) when they found mastectomy flaps thinner than 1 cm. When hADM is not available, an APM is used. Here, the authors present their results with APM utilisation. Methods: From January to September 2024, patients undergoing pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with mastectomy flaps thinner than 1 cm were selected. Specifically, implants were wrapped in bovine pericardium (Exaflex—MAGGI Srl, TO, Italy). During a minimum 6 months follow-up, outcomes were recorded; in particular, rippling incidence was assessed with indication for secondary fat grafting. Results: Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Average age was 54.4 years (range: 39–70), three of them were smokers (15.8%) and three were affected from diabetes or hypertension (15.8%). With one case bilateral, a total of 20 mastectomies were performed. Intra-operative mastectomy flaps’ thickness mean measure was 0.75 cm (range: 0.5–0.8). All of them underwent two-stage pre-pectoral IBR with APM covering the implant. During a mean follow-up of 9.5 months (range: 6–13), no major post-operative complications occurred and five cases (25%) presented rippling. Conclusions: With no consensus on the superiority of either biologic matrixes or SMs, the authors extended their patients’ selection tool to aid in the choice of peri-prosthetic device. The bovine APM use showed capacity of reducing secondary lipofilling interventions in patients with thin mastectomy flaps.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2023
- Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the use of biological and synthetic meshes in one-stage implant-based breast reconstructionBreast Cancer, 2022
- Looking beyond the prepectoral breast reconstruction experience: a systematic literature review on associated oncological safety and cancer recurrence incidenceEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2021
- The Bovine Pericardium Matrix in Immediate Implant-Based Breast ReconstructionAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020
- A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstructionJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2019
- Rippling Following Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction: Aetiology, Emerging Treatment Options and a Novel Classification of SeverityAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2018
- Acellular bovine pericardium in implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review of the literatureEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2017
- TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution seriesEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2014
- Early results of subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate silicone prosthetic implant for carcinoma of the breastBritish Journal of Surgery, 1983
- Mammary carcinoma — multidisciplinary treatment with bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstructionJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1980