Trials in surgery
Authors:
- 25 November 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 91 (1) , 6-16
Abstract
Background: Trials in surgery pose some special problems. This paper examines these with reference to 10 years of methodological research sponsored by the UK National Health Service Research and Development programme. Methods: Solutions to common problems encountered in surgical studies were considered, such as issues of blinding, dependence of results on technical skill and continued evolution of technology. Results: Numerous methodological developments are described, including the tracker trial concept in which trial design can be adapted to take account of technical developments and interim results. The governance of trials, solutions to ethical conundra and the rising importance of databases are also discussed. Conclusion: Like surgery itself, the methodological toolkit for evaluation of surgical procedures continues to evolve. The rules of statistical and scientific probity provide plenty of scope for imaginative design solutions for surgical trials.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- What to do about poor clinical performance in clinical trials Commentary: Of course patients should be told Commentary: The surgeon is only one factorBMJ, 2002
- Families of Trials: The Answers to All Our Questions?Cerebrovascular Diseases, 1999
- The Ethical Problems with Sham Surgery in Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Use of Placebo Surgery in Controlled Trials of a Cellular-Based Therapy for Parkinson's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 1994
- Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Stroke and Trauma Division. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators.Stroke, 1991
- Failure of Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- A Randomized Trial of Aspirin and Sulfinpyrazone in Threatened StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978