Where learning starts? A framework for thinking about lectures in university mathematics
- 23 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
- Vol. 41 (5) , 609-623
Abstract
Lectures have been widely criticized as a method of teaching, but remain a standard component of most university mathematics courses. Does this necessarily harm students' education? This critical review contends that many arguments against lecturing are misconceived, at least when applied to mathematics. The effectiveness of lectures in carrying out various functions is discussed with reference to some recent educational research. There is evidence that lectures can be effective in communicating information, modelling reasoning and motivating students. Therefore, when supported appropriately by other activities, lectures provide an effective component of a mathematical education.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond social constructivist perspectives on assessment: the centring of knowledgeTeaching in Higher Education, 2008
- What Sort of Pedagogic Theory do we need for Teaching Mathematics in Higher Education?MSOR Connections, 2006
- Teaching by the Moore MethodMSOR Connections, 2006
- Understanding Student DifferencesJournal of Engineering Education, 2005
- Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship'Studies in Higher Education, 2003
- Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysisStudies in Higher Education, 2002
- The effectiveness of school-type classes compared to the traditional lecture/tutorial method for teaching quantitative methods to business studentsStudies in Higher Education, 1996
- How to Teach a Class by the Modified Moore MethodThe American Mathematical Monthly, 1995
- The significance of disciplinary differencesStudies in Higher Education, 1994
- Student Oriented Teaching--The Moore MethodThe American Mathematical Monthly, 1970