Green finance, technological progress, and ecological performance—evidence from 30 Provinces in China
Authors:
- 2 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
- Vol. 29 (44) , 66295-66314
Abstract
The interaction between green finance and other factors, such as ecological environment, has been a research hotspot nowadays. Especially, the reasonable guiding of capital into energy conservation and environmental protection industries would greatly affect those factors, so as to the relation between them. This paper aimed to analyze the relationships between green finance, technological progress, and ecological performance quantitatively. The entropy method was used to respectively construct the system of index for green finance and technological progress, and index for ecological performance was measured by the super-SBM model. The panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) model was selected to empirically analyze dynamic relationships based on datasets from 30 provinces in China during 2008–2019 period. The results told that (1) from 2008 to 2019, China’s overall level of green finance, technological progress and ecological performance increased to varying degrees. Spatially, the areas with high-developed green finance greatly coincided with those such as large cities or the eastern coast that had good financial development. The distribution of technological progress index were similar, except some underdeveloped areas with relatively advanced scientific research institutes. The ecological performance, however, was high in the South and low in the north. (2) In the lag for 3 years, the influence of green finance on ecological performance in different regions was all positive for that all the coefficient symbols that passed the significance test were above 0, while that on technological progress was negative first and then positive. And the effects of technological progress on ecological performance were positive in ecological regions and negative in low ecological regions (0.0893 and -0.1211 in the case of three-stage lag respectively). (3) The contribution of green finance to ecological performance was high according to the results of variance decomposition, maintained at about 30%, and that of technological progress increased year by year (from 0.000 to 0.039). Therefore, we proposed to strengthen the development of green finance in underdeveloped regions. The emphasis should be laid on the researches and applications of green technology, the formulation of financing policies in innovation compensation and the establishment of a dynamic monitoring system for the ecological environment.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial factors and the margins of trade: Evidence from cross-country firm-level dataJournal of Development Economics, 2010
- Banking on the Equator. Are Banks that Adopted the Equator Principles Different from Non-Adopters?World Development, 2007
- Technology, International Trade, and Pollution from U.S. ManufacturingSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Financial Development and TechnologySSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Evaluating environmental performance using statistical process control techniquesEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2002
- Non‐parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper IndustryAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001
- Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA)European Journal of Operational Research, 2001
- A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysisEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2001
- IVIG DECREASES PRA AND ALLOWS SUCCESSFUL HEART TRANSPLANTATION IN SENSITIZED VAD RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1998
- Ecological performance standards for land developmentBiological Conservation, 1983