Laparoscopic surgery facilitates administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer: propensity score analyses
Open Access
- 1 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cancer Management and Research
- Vol. ume 11, 7141-7157
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a laparoscopic approach on long-term oncological outcomes in curative intent surgery for pT4 colon cancer, in both overall and stratified subgroups with distinct clinical entities. Patients and methods: Patients with a pT4N0-2M0 colon cancer from four centers between 2000 and 2014 were included. Laparoscopic and open approaches were compared according to the intention-to-treat principle. Propensity scores were used to adjust for baseline differences between the groups in three manners: i) as a linear predictor in a Cox regression model, ii) to create a 1:1 matched cohort, and iii) to stratify patients into four groups with an increasing chance of receiving laparoscopy. Results: In total, 424 patients were included. After 1:1 matching, a laparoscopic approach correlated with higher rates of radical resection, lower morbidity, and a higher percentage of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. This translated into better 5-year disease-free survival (52% vs 40%, HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50–0.96) and 5-year overall survival (68% vs 57%, HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43–0.99). These results were confirmed in the other two propensity score analyses. In the multivariable models, adjuvant chemotherapy remained independently associated with better survival, whereas surgical approach lost significance. Conclusions: In locally advanced colon cancer, an intentional laparoscopic approach in experienced hands seems to decrease morbidity and to increase the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with improved survival.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer?Surgical Endoscopy, 2013
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Multivisceral Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative OutcomesJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2013
- Reasons physicians do not recommend and patients refuse adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: a population based chart reviewBMC Research Notes, 2012
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational StudiesMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- Anti-β1 Integrin Antibody Reduces Surgery-Induced Adhesion of Colon Carcinoma Cells to Traumatized Peritoneal SurfacesAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Randomized clinical trial and follow-up study of cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplicationBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004