The boycott of the Israeli Medical Association by the British Medical Association: a critical appraisal
Author:
- 19 November 2025
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
Abstract
This Current Controversy article critically reviews the recent motion by delegates of the British Medical Association to boycott the Israel Medical Association (IMA) for not upholding medical neutrality. While I generally support this motion, I disagree with the reasons justifying it. I also argue that the main issue here is not whether the IMA upheld medical neutrality but rather whether it upheld its duty to engage in political and social advocacy, by which I mean espousing a moral stance and lobbying the Israeli government and the Israeli public to accept it and act on it. Lastly, I argue that the greatest value in the boycott of the IMA lies in its symbolism of solidarity and deontological justification rather than its utility.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Humanitarian Law and the Immunity of Hospitals in GazaBioethics, 2025
- Letter to the EditorThe American Journal of Bioethics, 2024
- Medical Ethics at War: Is Israel Obligated to Treat Hamas Combatants?Journal of Jewish Ethics, 2023
- The Ethics of Academic BoycottThe Journal of Politics, 2016
- The campaign about doctors and torture in Israel five years onBMJ, 2014
- Academic BoycottsJournal of Political Philosophy, 2010
- Expectations and Obligations: Professionalism and Medicine’s Social Contract with SocietyPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2008
- Professional Medical AssociationsJAMA, 1999