Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Preterm Neonates with Acute Respiratory Failure
Authors:
- Federico LonghiniFLFederico Longhini
- Federica FerreroFFFederica Ferrero
- Daniele De LucaDLDaniele De Luca
- Gianluca CosiGCGianluca Cosi
- Moreno AlemaniMAMoreno Alemani
- Davide ColomboDCDavide Colombo
- Gianmaria CammarotaGCGianmaria Cammarota
- Paola BerniPBPaola Berni
- Giorgio ContiGCGiorgio Conti
- Gianni BonaGBGianni Bona
- Francesco Della CorteFCFrancesco Della Corte
- Paolo NavalesiPNPaolo Navalesi
- 7 November 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Neonatology
- Vol. 107 (1) , 60-67
Abstract
Background: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a novel mode of ventilation that has been demonstrated to improve infant-ventilator interaction, compared to the conventional modes in retrospective and short-term studies. Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the physiologic effects of NAVA in comparison with pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) in two nonrandomized 12-hour periods. Methods: We studied 14 consecutive intubated preterm neonates receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Peak airway pressure (Pawpeak), diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), tidal volume (VT), mechanical (RRmec) and neural (RRneu) respiratory rates, neural apneas, and the capillary arterialized blood gases were measured. The RRmec-to-RRneu ratio (MNR) and the asynchrony index were also calculated. The amount of fentanyl administered was recorded. Results: Pawpeak and VT were greater in PRVC (p < 0.01). Blood gases and RRmec were not different between modes, while RRneu and the EAdi swings were greater in NAVA (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). MNR and the asynchrony index were remarkably lower in NAVA than in PRVC (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001, respectively). 1,841 neural apneas were observed during PRVC, with none in NAVA. Less fentanyl was administered during NAVA, as opposed to PRVC (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In acutely ill preterm neonates, NAVA can be safely and efficiently applied for 12 consecutive hours. Compared to PRVC, NAVA is well tolerated with fewer sedatives.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimizing Patient-Ventilator Synchrony During Invasive Ventilator Assist in Children and Infants Remains a Difficult Task*Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2013
- European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants - 2013 UpdateNeonatology, 2013
- Volume-Targeted versus Pressure-Limited Ventilation for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisNeonatology, 2011
- Ventilation Practices in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional StudyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2010
- Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in children: An observational studyPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- A prospective crossover comparison of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure-support ventilation in a pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit population*Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Patient-Ventilator Interaction During Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Low Birth Weight InfantsPediatric Research, 2009
- Randomized Crossover Comparison of Proportional Assist Ventilation and Patient-Triggered Ventilation in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants with Evolving Chronic Lung DiseaseNeonatology, 2007
- Prevention and Management of Pain in the Neonate: An UpdatePediatrics, 2006
- Relationship of the ventilatory response to hypoxia with neonatal apnea in preterm infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2004