Craniotomy for meningioma in the United States between 1988 and 2000: decreasing rate of mortality and the effect of provider caseload
Authors:
- Michael W. McDermottMMMichael W. McDermott
- Bob S. CarterBCBob S. Carter
- Fred G. BarkerFBFred G. Barker
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 102 (6) , 977-986
Abstract
Object. The goal of this study was to determine the risk of adverse outcomes after contemporary surgical treatment of meningiomas in the US and trends in patient outcomes and patterns of care. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study by using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample covering the period of 1988 to 2000. Multivariate regression models with disposition end points of death and hospital discharge were used to test patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, including volume of care, as outcome predictors. Multivariate analyses revealed that larger-volume centers had lower mortality rates for patients who underwent craniotomy for meningioma (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.93, p = 0.01). Adverse discharge disposition was also less likely at high-volume hospitals (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62–0.80, p < 0.001). With respect to the surgeon caseload, there was a trend toward a lower rate of mortality after surgery when higher-caseload providers were involved, and a significantly less frequent adverse discharge disposition (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62–0.80, p <, 0.001). The annual meningioma caseload in the US increased 83% between 1988 and 2000, from 3900 patients/year to 7200 patients/year. In-hospital mortality rates decreased 61%, from 4.5% in 1988 to 1.8% in 2000. Reductions in the mortality rates were largest at high-volume centers (a 72% reduction in the relative mortality rate at largest-volume-quintile centers, compared with a 6% increase in the relative mortality rate at lowest-volume-quintile centers). The number of US hospitals where craniotomies were performed for meningiomas increased slightly. Fewer centers hosted one meningioma resection annually, whereas the largest centers had disproportionate increases in their caseloads, indicating a modest centralization of meningioma surgery in the US during this interval. Conclusions. The mortality and adverse hospital discharge disposition rates were lower when meningioma surgery was performed by high-volume providers. The annual US caseload increased, whereas the mortality rates decreased, especially at high-volume centers.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Craniotomy for the resection of metastatic brain tumors in the U.S., 1988–2000Cancer, 2004
- The Impact of Provider Volume on Mortality after Intracranial Tumor ResectionNeurosurgery, 2003
- Treatment of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in CaliforniaStroke, 2001
- Incidence and clinical features of asymptomatic meningiomasJournal of Neurosurgery, 2000
- Natural history of elderly patients with asymptomatic meningiomasJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2000
- Relationship Between the Volume of Craniotomies for Cerebral Aneurysm Performed at New York State Hospitals and In-Hospital MortalityStroke, 1996
- The natural history and growth rate of asymptomatic meningiomas: a review of 60 patientsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1995
- Administrative Databasesʼ Complication Coding in Anterior Spinal Fusion ProceduresSpine, 1995
- Growth rate of incidental meningiomasJournal of Neurosurgery, 1990
- Relation between Surgeons' Practice Volumes and Geographic Variation in the Rate of Carotid EndarterectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989