Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and impact on clinical outcomes
Open Access
- 6 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal Open
- Vol. 4 (4) , oeae058
Abstract
Catheter ablation is the most effective rhythm-control option in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is currently considered an option mainly for improving symptoms. We aimed to assess the impact of catheter ablation on hard clinical outcomes. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation vs. optimized medical treatment. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 8 January 2024, for trials published ≤10 years. We pooled data through risk ratio (RR) and mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence interval (CI), and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT). Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were performed for the presence/absence of heart failure (HF), paroxysmal/persistent AF, early ablation, higher/lower quality, and published ≤5 vs. >5 years. Twenty-two RCTs were identified, including 6400 patients followed for 6–52 months. All primary endpoints were significantly reduced by catheter ablation vs. medical management: all-cause hospitalization (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39–0.85, P = 0.006), AF relapse (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.39–0.58, P < 0.00001), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.86, P = 0.0007, NNT = 44.7, driven by trials with HF patients). A benefit was also demonstrated for all secondary endpoints: cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.34–0.87), cardiovascular (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.96), and HF hospitalizations (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.89), AF burden (MD = 20.6%, 95% CI 5.6–35.5), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery (MD = 5.7%, 95% CI 3.5–7.9), and quality of life (MLHFQ, AFEQT, and SF-36 scales). Catheter ablation significantly reduced hospitalizations, AF burden, and relapse, and improved quality of life. An impact on hard clinical outcomes, with an important mortality reduction and improvement in LVEF, was seen for patients with AF and HF.Keywords
Funding Information
- UCL BHF Research Accelerator (AA/18/6/34223)
- NIHR (NIHR129463)
- UKRI/ERC/HORIZON (10103153)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation vs Medical Therapy and Psychological DistressJAMA, 2023
- A randomized sham‐controlled study of pulmonary vein isolation in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (The SHAM‐PVI study): Study design and rationaleClinical Cardiology, 2023
- The impact of catheter ablation in patient’s heart failure and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trialsJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2022
- Outcomes of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2022
- Assessment of Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drugs for First-line Therapy of Atrial FibrillationJAMA Cardiology, 2021
- Long-Term Outcomes and Improvements in Quality of Life in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic DrugsAmerican Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2020
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2019
- Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial FibrillationJAMA, 2019
- Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Medication on Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial FibrillationJAMA, 2019
- Radiofrequency Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drugs as First-Line Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (RAAFT-2)JAMA, 2014