New sunspots and aurorae in the historical Chinese text corpus? Comments on uncritical digital search applications
Authors:
- 1 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Astronomische Nachrichten
- Vol. 339 (1) , 10-29
Abstract
We review some applications of the method of electronic searching for historical observations of sunspots and aurorae in the Chinese text corpus by Hayakawa et al. (,,,), Kawamura et al. (), and Tamazawa et al. (). However, we show strong shortcomings in the digital search technique as applied by them: almost all likely true sunspot and aurora records were presented earlier (e.g., Xu et al.), which are not mentioned in those papers; the remaining records are dubious and often refer to other phenomena, neither spots nor aurorae (this also applies to Hayakawa et al.). The alleged aurorae in Hayakawa et al. () and Kawamura et al. () show a broad peak around full moon, not expected for aurorae. Hayakawa et al. () use the Korean reportAt night, the gate of heaven was opened(between AD 992 Dec 6 and AD 993 Jan 25, i.e., close to the14C variation AD 993/994) to estimate the Dst index of solar activity, even though the text does not fulfill any discriminative aurora criteria (except night‐time). Most of the above publications include very few Chinese texts and translations, and their tables with abbreviated keywords do not allow the reader to consider alternative interpretations (the tables also do not specify which records mention night‐time). We have compared some of their event tables with previously published catalogues and found various discrepancies. There are also intrinsic inconsistencies, misleading information (lunar phase for day‐time events), and dating errors. We present Chinese texts and translations for some of their presumable new aurorae: only one can be considered a likely true aurora (AD 604 Jan); some others were selected on the sole basis of the use of the wordlightorrainbow. Several alleged new aurorae present observations beside the Sun during day‐time. There are well‐known comets among their presumable aurorae. We also discuss (a) whetherheiqi ri pangcan stand for black spot(s)on one side oforbesidethe sun, (b) the aurora color confusion in Hayakawa et al. (,), and (c) whetherwhiteandunusual rainbowscan be aurorae.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clue to an ancient cosmic-ray event?Nature, 2012
- A signature of cosmic-ray increase in ad 774–775 from tree rings in JapanNature, 2012
- Historical sunspot observations: A reviewAdvances In Space Research, 2007
- Identification of possible intense historical geomagnetic storms using combined sunspot and auroral observations from East AsiaAnnales Geophysicae, 2005
- The Sunspot and Auroral Activity Cycle Derived from Korean Historical Records of the 11th–18th CenturySolar Physics, 2004
- A 250‐year cycle in naked‐eye observations of sunspotsGeophysical Research Letters, 2002
- Ancient AuroraeIsis, 1979
- Evidence for a supernova, of A.D. 1006The Astronomical Journal, 1965
- Ancient aurorae seen in JapanJournal of Geophysical Research, 1956
- Early Mention of the Aurora BorealisNature, 1870