Nomogram in Knee Instability: 3D Gait Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Patients
- 20 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Vol. 56 (9) , 1554-1564
Abstract
Background Measures of knee stability by symptoms, physical examination, and imaging do not accurately reflect the condition of knee movement. Therefore, this study aimed to introduce a model for assessing knee stability during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Aims Three dimensional(3D) gait analysis system was used to quantify the gait of patients and display the clinical diagnosis model of knee instability with nomogram to guide clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods This cross-sectional study performed a 3D gait analysis in 93 participants with knee OA and 40 healthy control subjects. Multiple linear regression analysis investigated the correlation between gait parameters and knee extension/flexion stability. The predicting models were built applied multinomial logistic regression analysis and calibration plot, C-index, decision curve analysis, bootstrapping validation were used to assess the predicting nomograms' clinical usefulness and internal validation. Results Multiple linear regression analysis indicated knee extension stability was correlated with walking speed (β = 0.256, P = 0.006), knee extensor strength (β = −0.196, P = 0.03), static HKA (β = 0.218, P = 0.016), width of the femoral diaphysis (β = −0.282, P = 0.002) and WOMAC score (β = 0.281, P = 0.002); however, knee flexion stability was correlated with walking speed (β = 0.340, P < 0.001), knee flexor strength (β = −0.327, P < 0.001), posterior tibial slope (PTS) (β = 0.291, P < 0.001), knee flexion/extension range of motion (ROM) (β = 0.177, P = 0.018) and HSS score (β = −0.173, P = 0.028). We developed and internally validated a knee instability risk nomogram in patients with knee OA. Conclusions These results indicated that using the 3D motion analysis system is feasible to quantify knee instability. The current prediction models could serve as a reliable tool to quantify the possibility of knee instability in OA patients. Trial registration number (TRN) ChiCTR2100051302; Date of registration: Sep 18, 2021; retrospectively registered.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Science Foundation of China (81974343)
- Nature Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010394)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes of pelvis control with subacute stroke: A comparison of body-weight- support treadmill training coupled virtual reality system and over-ground trainingTechnology and Health Care, 2015
- The unstable kneeThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2014
- Diagnosis, Causes and Treatments of Instability Following Total Knee ArthroplastyKnee Surgery & Related Research, 2014
- Altered tibiofemoral joint contact mechanics and kinematics in patients with knee osteoarthritis and episodic complaints of joint instabilityClinical Biomechanics, 2014
- Varus thrust and knee frontal plane dynamic motion in persons with knee osteoarthritisOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2013
- Tibial Component Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Intramedullary Instrumentation: A Prospective AnalysisThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010
- Dynamic knee joint stiffness in subjects with a progressive increase in severity of knee osteoarthritisClinical Biomechanics, 2009
- Reports of joint instability in knee osteoarthritis: Its prevalence and relationship to physical functionArthritis Care & Research, 2004
- The Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and EtiologyJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004
- Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implicationsCurrent Opinion in Rheumatology, 2002