Efficacy of the non-instrumentation endodontic treatment with CTZ paste in primary molars: Protocol of a multicenter randomized clinical trial with two years of follow-up
Authors:
- Pablo Silveira SantosPSPablo Silveira Santos
- Natália Matsuda de OliveiraNONatália Matsuda de Oliveira
- Tatiane RamosTRTatiane Ramos
- Ana Paula DornellasADAna Paula Dornellas
- Aurélio de Oliveira RochaARAurélio de Oliveira Rocha
- Filipe Colombo VitaliFVFilipe Colombo Vitali
- Bárbara Suelen MocceliniBMBárbara Suelen Moccelini
- Danielle Cristina Alves RigoDRDanielle Cristina Alves Rigo
- Renata Pereira de Samuel MarquesRMRenata Pereira de Samuel Marques
- Laura Regina Antunes PontesLPLaura Regina Antunes Pontes
- Juliana de Medeiros MatosJMJuliana de Medeiros Matos
- Márcia Costa LouvainMLMárcia Costa Louvain
Open Access
- 27 November 2022
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by Research, Society and Development in Research, Society and Development
- Vol. 11 (16)
Abstract
Objective: There is a lack of high-quality evidence on the efficacy of the non-instrumentation endodontic treatment (NIET) in primary molars, compared to the conventional endodontic treatment technique. This protocol describes a multicenter randomized clinical trial that aims to evaluate the efficacy of a NIET technique for primary molars using a paste containing antibiotics (chloramphenicol and tetracycline – CTZ group) compared to a control group of conventional technique and root filling with zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE). Methodology: Children aged 3 to 9 years (N=218) will be randomly allocated to one of the groups: CTZ or ZOE. In CTZ, after the location of root canals entrance, irrigation will be performed using 1% sodium hypochlorite and CTZ paste will be placed over the root canal entrances, with no instrumentation of the root canals. In ZOE group, manual instrumentation of root canals with endodontic K-files will be performed, and then, the root canals will be filled with ZOE paste. At the same appointment, teeth will be restored with a double-seal of glass ionomer and a bulk fill resin composite. Children will be followed-up for 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary endpoint will be the success of endodontic treatments evaluated by clinical and radiographic criteria after 24 months. Conclusions: NIET with CTZ paste could be an option to manage primary teeth, once the technique could have non-inferior efficacy to the conventional technique that involves root canal instrumentation. The approach could have good acceptance from children and parents considering the reduced clinical time.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antibiotic Mixtures in Noninstrumental Endodontic Treatment of Primary Teeth with Necrotic Pulps: A Systematic ReviewInternational Journal of Dentistry, 2021
- Cost analysis of endodontic treatment in primary teeth: results from a randomized clinical trialBrazilian Oral Research, 2021
- Is there evidence for the use of lesion sterilization and tissue repair therapy in the endodontic treatment of primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysesClinical Oral Investigations, 2020
- Biocompatibility of root filling pastes used in primary teethInternational Endodontic Journal, 2014
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trialsBMJ, 2013
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2012
- Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2004
- Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxietyInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2002
- In‐vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocyclineInternational Endodontic Journal, 1996
- Sterilization of infected root‐canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situInternational Endodontic Journal, 1996